Report Summary

  • 38

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    58% of other websites

  • 81

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 52% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    75% of websites

shippinglabels.com

Shipping Labels - Custom Mailing and Shipping Labels

Page Load Speed

2 sec in total

First Response

427 ms

Resources Loaded

1.4 sec

Page Rendered

241 ms

shippinglabels.com screenshot

About Website

Visit shippinglabels.com now to see the best up-to-date Shipping Labels content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about shippinglabels.com

Largest online US supplier of Shipping Labels and Custom Shipping Labels. Find variety of Fragile Stickers, Handle With Care Labels, Mailing Labels & more.

Visit shippinglabels.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Shippinglabels.com page load time and found that the first response time was 427 ms and then it took 1.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

shippinglabels.com performance score

38

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.2 s

44/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.2 s

11/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.0 s

80/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value830 ms

35/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.152

75/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.6 s

14/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.shippinglabels.com

427 ms

jquery-ui.css

117 ms

bootstrap.min.css

148 ms

smart-icons.css

111 ms

font-awesome.min.css

8 ms

Our browser made a total of 94 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 41% of them (39 requests) were addressed to the original Shippinglabels.com, 44% (41 requests) were made to Images.shippinglabels.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (427 ms) belongs to the original domain Shippinglabels.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.1 MB (68%)

Content Size

1.7 MB

After Optimization

532.3 kB

In fact, the total size of Shippinglabels.com main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 668.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 96.1 kB

  • Original 109.4 kB
  • After minification 81.6 kB
  • After compression 13.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 27.8 kB, which is 25% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 96.1 kB or 88% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-51%

Potential reduce by 276.7 kB

  • Original 544.9 kB
  • After minification 268.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Shipping Labels needs image optimization as it can save up to 276.7 kB or 51% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-70%

Potential reduce by 467.4 kB

  • Original 668.7 kB
  • After minification 570.7 kB
  • After compression 201.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 467.4 kB or 70% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 279.3 kB

  • Original 328.9 kB
  • After minification 287.1 kB
  • After compression 49.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Shippinglabels.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 279.3 kB or 85% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 33 (36%)

Requests Now

91

After Optimization

58

The browser has sent 91 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Shipping Labels. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

shippinglabels.com accessibility score

81

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

shippinglabels.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

shippinglabels.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Shippinglabels.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Shippinglabels.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Shipping Labels. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: