4.3 sec in total
916 ms
2.8 sec
648 ms
Visit shoft.co.uk now to see the best up-to-date SHOFT content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about shoft.co.uk
Shoft is a revolutionary gadget that helps relieve back pain from driving, by keeping you seated in the most comfortable position
Visit shoft.co.ukWe analyzed Shoft.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 916 ms and then it took 3.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
shoft.co.uk performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.8 s
12/100
10%
Value14.3 s
0/100
25%
Value12.7 s
3/100
10%
Value560 ms
53/100
30%
Value0.077
95/100
15%
Value12.9 s
13/100
10%
916 ms
87 ms
59 ms
70 ms
178 ms
Our browser made a total of 84 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 73% of them (61 requests) were addressed to the original Shoft.co.uk, 5% (4 requests) were made to Maps.google.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Fast.wistia.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (916 ms) belongs to the original domain Shoft.co.uk.
Page size can be reduced by 1.0 MB (53%)
1.9 MB
894.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Shoft.co.uk main page is 1.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 65.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 65.5 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 37.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. SHOFT images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 621.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 621.5 kB or 59% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 290.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Shoft.co.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 290.2 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 56 (69%)
81
25
The browser has sent 81 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of SHOFT. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 44 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
shoft.co.uk
916 ms
js
87 ms
css
59 ms
css
70 ms
style.css
178 ms
media.css
188 ms
styles.css
187 ms
cff-style.css
187 ms
font-awesome.min.css
289 ms
prettyPhoto.css
186 ms
style.css
255 ms
layerslider.css
259 ms
flexslider.css
260 ms
style.css
258 ms
prettyPhoto.css
258 ms
jquery.js
305 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
332 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.js
336 ms
simple-contact-form.js
338 ms
layerslider.kreaturamedia.jquery.js
418 ms
jquery-easing-1.3.js
337 ms
jquerytransit.js
384 ms
layerslider.transitions.js
411 ms
E-v1.js
55 ms
all.css
322 ms
jquery.form.min.js
196 ms
scripts.js
195 ms
cff-scripts.js
243 ms
jquery.mousewheel.min.js
270 ms
jquery.flexslider.min.js
447 ms
modernizr.js
447 ms
jquery.carouFredSel-6.2.1-packed.js
453 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.js
455 ms
imagesLoaded.js
455 ms
jquery.isotope.min.js
455 ms
jquery.flexslider-min.js
455 ms
jquery.cycle.lite.js
456 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
455 ms
jquery.hoverIntent.minified.js
456 ms
jquery.eislideshow.js
622 ms
froogaloop.js
621 ms
jquery.placeholder.js
621 ms
jquery.waypoint.js
620 ms
gmap.js
620 ms
gauge.js
622 ms
jquery.ddslick.min.js
624 ms
jquery.infinitescroll.min.js
626 ms
main.js
607 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.js
602 ms
wp-embed.min.js
602 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
362 ms
iframe_api
227 ms
analytics.js
163 ms
mv5c8amtm3
211 ms
facebook.png
310 ms
bg-popup.png
312 ms
linkedin.png
311 ms
youtube.png
311 ms
google.png
311 ms
SHOFT_logo.png
313 ms
top-banner-reviews-2.jpeg
792 ms
buynow.gif
792 ms
install_video.png
790 ms
spine2.png
776 ms
shoft_why_wouldnt_you_.png
776 ms
Backcare-Gold-Supporter.jpeg
387 ms
ico-user.png
383 ms
twitter.png
765 ms
FseMmDpyuY1CFuv24IH4Dg.ttf
152 ms
APH4jr0uSos5wiut5cpjronF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
151 ms
iframe_shim
98 ms
collect
27 ms
www-widgetapi.js
408 ms
socialbar-v1.js
378 ms
common.js
320 ms
util.js
321 ms
geocoder.js
327 ms
mobile_menu_bg.png
151 ms
tweet_button.html
77 ms
socialbuttons_sprite.png
72 ms
jot
141 ms
like.php
154 ms
TY3MhkXpWJ-.js
42 ms
LVx-xkvaJ0b.png
36 ms
shoft.co.uk accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
ARIA IDs are not unique
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
shoft.co.uk best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
shoft.co.uk SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Shoft.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Shoft.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
shoft.co.uk
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of SHOFT. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: