Report Summary

  • 18

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    34% of other websites

  • 80

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 50% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    84% of websites

shorecliffcommunications.com

InformationWeek, serving the information needs of the Business Technology Community

Page Load Speed

2.7 sec in total

First Response

118 ms

Resources Loaded

1.7 sec

Page Rendered

822 ms

shorecliffcommunications.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to shorecliffcommunications.com homepage info - get ready to check Shorecliffcommunications best content right away, or after learning these important things about shorecliffcommunications.com

InformationWeek.com: News analysis and commentary on information technology trends, including cloud computing, DevOps, data analytics, IT leadership, cybersecurity, and IT infrastructure.

Visit shorecliffcommunications.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Shorecliffcommunications.com page load time and found that the first response time was 118 ms and then it took 2.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

shorecliffcommunications.com performance score

18

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.0 s

24/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value18.4 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value12.7 s

3/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value5,050 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value21.1 s

1/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

shorecliffcommunications.com

118 ms

www.techweb.com

21 ms

www.informationweek.com

41 ms

css

68 ms

informationweek.css

41 ms

Our browser made a total of 173 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Shorecliffcommunications.com, 43% (74 requests) were made to Img.deusm.com and 14% (24 requests) were made to Brightcove.vo.llnwd.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (514 ms) relates to the external source Content.dl-rms.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.3 MB (46%)

Content Size

2.7 MB

After Optimization

1.5 MB

In fact, the total size of Shorecliffcommunications.com main page is 2.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 226.7 kB

  • Original 266.3 kB
  • After minification 251.4 kB
  • After compression 39.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 226.7 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-10%

Potential reduce by 123.8 kB

  • Original 1.2 MB
  • After minification 1.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Shorecliffcommunications images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-69%

Potential reduce by 748.1 kB

  • Original 1.1 MB
  • After minification 1.1 MB
  • After compression 334.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 748.1 kB or 69% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-90%

Potential reduce by 155.7 kB

  • Original 173.2 kB
  • After minification 131.9 kB
  • After compression 17.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Shorecliffcommunications.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 155.7 kB or 90% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 64 (40%)

Requests Now

162

After Optimization

98

The browser has sent 162 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Shorecliffcommunications. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 33 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

shorecliffcommunications.com accessibility score

80

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

shorecliffcommunications.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

shorecliffcommunications.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Shorecliffcommunications.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Shorecliffcommunications.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Shorecliffcommunications. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: