1.6 sec in total
251 ms
886 ms
480 ms
Welcome to singlem4a.com homepage info - get ready to check Singlem 4 A best content for Malaysia right away, or after learning these important things about singlem4a.com
Single Collection and Music Video preview
Visit singlem4a.comWe analyzed Singlem4a.com page load time and found that the first response time was 251 ms and then it took 1.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.
singlem4a.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.8 s
58/100
10%
Value4.0 s
49/100
25%
Value2.8 s
96/100
10%
Value330 ms
75/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value7.3 s
50/100
10%
251 ms
11 ms
19 ms
17 ms
19 ms
Our browser made a total of 86 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 34% of them (29 requests) were addressed to the original Singlem4a.com, 44% (38 requests) were made to C2.staticflickr.com and 6% (5 requests) were made to Farm6.staticflickr.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (533 ms) relates to the external source C2.staticflickr.com.
Page size can be reduced by 375.4 kB (21%)
1.8 MB
1.4 MB
In fact, the total size of Singlem4a.com main page is 1.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 75.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 75.2 kB or 86% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 31.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Singlem 4 A images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 194.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 194.8 kB or 67% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 74.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Singlem4a.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 74.3 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 19 (23%)
83
64
The browser has sent 83 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Singlem 4 A. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
singlem4a.com
251 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
11 ms
styles.css
19 ms
gglcptch.css
17 ms
twitter-feed.css
19 ms
css
27 ms
style.css
28 ms
responsive.css
19 ms
widget.css
18 ms
jquery.js
34 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
23 ms
modernizr.min.js
26 ms
jquery.plugins.min.js
24 ms
jquery.form.min.js
31 ms
scripts.js
113 ms
masonry.min.js
112 ms
jquery.masonry.min.js
146 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
144 ms
theme.js
145 ms
comment-reply.min.js
149 ms
wp-embed.min.js
150 ms
14016861491_22afd0d682_o.jpg
354 ms
24319438104_0f002b3c31_o.jpg
354 ms
22215885258_c8a9136e00_o.jpg
353 ms
20551567302_581d3c935f_o.jpg
354 ms
19426185663_9b8dc7629a_o.jpg
350 ms
18989232945_566462c0e6_o.jpg
357 ms
24832068172_50a0fd6a73_o.jpg
330 ms
21782497023_5898a56963_o.jpg
297 ms
24856706891_d7ec82b3ab_o.jpg
329 ms
24950029035_ed429d19f6_o.jpg
346 ms
24323181763_9a4bbdabea_o.jpg
342 ms
21819340881_30b56552e7_o.jpg
340 ms
24856707281_77b4fbd6a7_o.jpg
341 ms
24950029535_4e3540195f_o.jpg
351 ms
24302081914_62b894372c_o.jpg
346 ms
24319438944_38c24e2509_o.jpg
367 ms
21530197645_fcb8f37465_o.jpg
358 ms
24856707781_f6d53ab948_o.jpg
371 ms
24319439414_470f7822cd_o.jpg
497 ms
24319439604_98c7d060d4_o.jpg
388 ms
24832067132_155329f1fb_o.jpg
388 ms
24654535210_faae2a9d57_o.jpg
395 ms
24319437904_bb654f1566_o.jpg
403 ms
21036491603_ed4201541a_o.jpg
408 ms
24582403729_4390aa1b6e_o.jpg
414 ms
24323183723_8d7032f830_o.jpg
422 ms
24582404709_ebeff0f7b1_o.jpg
417 ms
24832069802_07fa803fcd_o.jpg
436 ms
24698469210_e3d4753414_o.jpg
438 ms
24626345039_a37c509217_o.jpg
442 ms
24993973135_059dbf2bb7_o.jpg
459 ms
24950029815_30ff7419be_o.jpg
460 ms
24832068602_038bc5fb7a_o.jpg
472 ms
24856709081_cd0dd68c76_o.jpg
469 ms
24950030305_57e8dc986a_o.jpg
481 ms
24900677291_da4fdc35f2_o.jpg
505 ms
24626344669_d424cccdb4_o.jpg
495 ms
24363357414_216903fcac_o.jpg
506 ms
24364000264_272c866962_o.jpg
502 ms
24875968842_265e7c1d3f_o.jpg
503 ms
24698469500_df23e70277_o.jpg
533 ms
21657483275_5e53189973_o.jpg
322 ms
21469663658_609da817d4_o.jpg
341 ms
bg-pattern.png
220 ms
diamond_upholstery.png
220 ms
s.png
219 ms
bg-pattern-nav.png
238 ms
nav-sep.png
218 ms
bg-pattern-black.png
220 ms
section-shadow.png
221 ms
bg-grad.png
221 ms
13997313296_bb0e94f1db_o.jpg
323 ms
20792732044_d964c2fc5c_o.jpg
333 ms
19859091838_4a50167c02_o.jpg
330 ms
21101933668_b68855ef15_o.jpg
331 ms
20807623643_f05b60fc9f_o.jpg
334 ms
20551566952_307f8e8750_o.jpg
337 ms
20950420375_f859887cd9_o.jpg
328 ms
social.png
214 ms
analytics.js
170 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzHhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
50 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSnhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
83 ms
collect
16 ms
24698468950_b952a2e084_o.jpg
214 ms
24967659796_c121b4edba_o.jpg
204 ms
singlem4a.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
singlem4a.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
singlem4a.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Singlem4a.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Singlem4a.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
singlem4a.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Singlem 4 A. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: