Tools & Wizards About Us
sixsigmabasics.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 49

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    68% of other websites

  • 74

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 41% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    75% of websites

sixsigmabasics.com

Six Sigma Basics : Six Sigma Basics

Page Load Speed

6.7 sec in total

First Response

2 sec

Resources Loaded

4.1 sec

Page Rendered

625 ms

sixsigmabasics.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to sixsigmabasics.com homepage info - get ready to check Six Sigma Basics best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about sixsigmabasics.com

Six Sigma is the most effective methodology available for improving the performance of any organization by minimizing the defects in its products or services. Every error committed, has a cost associa...

Visit sixsigmabasics.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Sixsigmabasics.com page load time and found that the first response time was 2 sec and then it took 4.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

sixsigmabasics.com performance score

49

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.3 s

75/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.1 s

76/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.2 s

60/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value6,770 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.046

99/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value13.1 s

12/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

sixsigmabasics.com

2047 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

13 ms

style.css

157 ms

style-font.css

183 ms

style-responsive.css

176 ms

Our browser made a total of 48 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 35% of them (17 requests) were addressed to the original Sixsigmabasics.com, 17% (8 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 10% (5 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2 sec) belongs to the original domain Sixsigmabasics.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 253.8 kB (66%)

Content Size

382.8 kB

After Optimization

129.0 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Sixsigmabasics.com main page is 382.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 202.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 55.4 kB

  • Original 68.5 kB
  • After minification 67.2 kB
  • After compression 13.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 55.4 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 1.2 kB

  • Original 22.6 kB
  • After minification 21.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Six Sigma Basics images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-59%

Potential reduce by 120.5 kB

  • Original 202.8 kB
  • After minification 201.5 kB
  • After compression 82.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 120.5 kB or 59% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 76.8 kB

  • Original 88.9 kB
  • After minification 62.4 kB
  • After compression 12.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Sixsigmabasics.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 76.8 kB or 86% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 29 (76%)

Requests Now

38

After Optimization

9

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 38 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Six Sigma Basics. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

sixsigmabasics.com

sixsigmabasics.com

2047 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

13 ms

style.css

style.css

157 ms

style-font.css

style-font.css

183 ms

style-responsive.css

style-responsive.css

176 ms

custom.css

custom.css

177 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

194 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

181 ms

loader.php

loader.php

181 ms

show_ads.js

show_ads.js

193 ms

external.js

external.js

192 ms

suckerfish.js

suckerfish.js

190 ms

jquery.mobilemenu.js

jquery.mobilemenu.js

190 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

191 ms

comment-reply.min.js

comment-reply.min.js

189 ms

css

css

65 ms

feed.png

feed.png

93 ms

dot.gif

dot.gif

88 ms

ca-pub-4007022665842668.js

ca-pub-4007022665842668.js

76 ms

zrt_lookup.html

zrt_lookup.html

752 ms

show_ads_impl.js

show_ads_impl.js

632 ms

ODelI1aHBYDBqgeIAH2zlBM0YzuT7MdOe03otPbuUS0.woff

ODelI1aHBYDBqgeIAH2zlBM0YzuT7MdOe03otPbuUS0.woff

847 ms

toadOcfmlt9b38dHJxOBGNbE_oMaV8t2eFeISPpzbdE.woff

toadOcfmlt9b38dHJxOBGNbE_oMaV8t2eFeISPpzbdE.woff

881 ms

toadOcfmlt9b38dHJxOBGJ6-ys_j0H4QL65VLqzI3wI.woff

toadOcfmlt9b38dHJxOBGJ6-ys_j0H4QL65VLqzI3wI.woff

880 ms

toadOcfmlt9b38dHJxOBGFkQc6VGVFSmCnC_l7QZG60.woff

toadOcfmlt9b38dHJxOBGFkQc6VGVFSmCnC_l7QZG60.woff

880 ms

headerbg2.png

headerbg2.png

645 ms

fpTVHK8qsXbIeTHTrnQH6Nog-We9VNve39Jr4Vs_aDc.woff

fpTVHK8qsXbIeTHTrnQH6Nog-We9VNve39Jr4Vs_aDc.woff

790 ms

fpTVHK8qsXbIeTHTrnQH6PULlOK_XQENnt2ryrY843E.woff

fpTVHK8qsXbIeTHTrnQH6PULlOK_XQENnt2ryrY843E.woff

790 ms

M2Jd71oPJhLKp0zdtTvoMzNrcjQuD0pTu1za2FULaMs.woff

M2Jd71oPJhLKp0zdtTvoMzNrcjQuD0pTu1za2FULaMs.woff

789 ms

fpTVHK8qsXbIeTHTrnQH6GGomRtBD2u8FwSY4jjlmeA.woff

fpTVHK8qsXbIeTHTrnQH6GGomRtBD2u8FwSY4jjlmeA.woff

803 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

395 ms

ads

ads

335 ms

osd.js

osd.js

84 ms

ads

ads

389 ms

collect

collect

12 ms

collect

collect

67 ms

m_js_controller.js

m_js_controller.js

27 ms

abg.js

abg.js

45 ms

favicon

favicon

101 ms

googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png

googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png

98 ms

nessie_icon_tiamat_white.png

nessie_icon_tiamat_white.png

78 ms

s

s

61 ms

x_button_blue2.png

x_button_blue2.png

40 ms

10270304490718419106

10270304490718419106

15 ms

nr-892.min.js

nr-892.min.js

130 ms

fBnyGA8Aionz5086-mElmoOSPUuyQ1M9Un647_EjucU.js

fBnyGA8Aionz5086-mElmoOSPUuyQ1M9Un647_EjucU.js

31 ms

ui

ui

118 ms

93f4f28924

93f4f28924

156 ms

Accessibility Review

sixsigmabasics.com accessibility score

74

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

Best Practices

sixsigmabasics.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

sixsigmabasics.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sixsigmabasics.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Sixsigmabasics.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

sixsigmabasics.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Six Sigma Basics. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: