6.7 sec in total
110 ms
6 sec
546 ms
Visit slidelive.com now to see the best up-to-date Slidelive content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about slidelive.com
Visit slidelive.comWe analyzed Slidelive.com page load time and found that the first response time was 110 ms and then it took 6.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
slidelive.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value0.7 s
100/100
10%
Value1.8 s
98/100
25%
Value0.7 s
100/100
10%
Value130 ms
96/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value1.6 s
100/100
10%
110 ms
31 ms
2058 ms
1025 ms
30 ms
Our browser made a total of 62 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 85% of them (53 requests) were addressed to the original Slidelive.com, 3% (2 requests) were made to Apis.google.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Facebook.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Slidelive.com.
Page size can be reduced by 265.9 kB (29%)
908.4 kB
642.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Slidelive.com main page is 908.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 601.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 20.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 4.1 kB, which is 15% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 20.1 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 27.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Slidelive images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 145.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 145.7 kB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 72.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Slidelive.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 72.5 kB or 96% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 18 (33%)
55
37
The browser has sent 55 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Slidelive. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.slidelive.com
110 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
31 ms
wppg-photo.css
2058 ms
front.css
1025 ms
page-list.css
30 ms
style.css
1125 ms
rtbs_style.min.css
1055 ms
jquery.js
1068 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
45 ms
jquery.lightbox-0.5.js
65 ms
common-scripts.js
86 ms
rtbs.min.js
105 ms
wppg-photo-gallery-template-3.css
121 ms
masonry.pkgd.min.js
186 ms
canto_clients.css
204 ms
wp-embed.min.js
225 ms
slidelive-e1424756203270.png
1022 ms
bnr.jpg
166 ms
s1-lft-img-2.png
2022 ms
s1-lft-img-1.png
2021 ms
s1-dot.jpg
165 ms
s1-img.jpg
1025 ms
s2-bnr.jpg
166 ms
s3-dot.png
165 ms
s4-bnr.jpg
167 ms
s4-img-10.png
166 ms
s4-img-9.png
167 ms
s4-img-8.png
168 ms
s4-img-7.png
170 ms
s4-img-6.png
167 ms
s4-img-5.png
173 ms
s4-img-4.png
185 ms
s4-img-3.png
189 ms
s4-img-2.png
218 ms
s4-img-1.png
233 ms
s5-img-1.jpg
257 ms
s5-img-3.jpg
290 ms
s5-img-4.jpg
258 ms
s5-img-6.jpg
289 ms
s5-img-2.jpg
315 ms
s5-img-5.jpg
315 ms
s6-icn-1.jpg
328 ms
s6-icn-2.jpg
335 ms
s6-icn-3.jpg
351 ms
s6-icn-4.jpg
352 ms
s6-icn-5.jpg
366 ms
raleway-regular-webfont.woff
564 ms
avantgardece-demi-webfont.ttf
362 ms
Raleway-Bold.ttf
411 ms
Raleway-Medium.ttf
464 ms
Raleway-Light.ttf
543 ms
Raleway-SemiBold.ttf
606 ms
plusone.js
36 ms
all.js
77 ms
widgets.js
141 ms
widgets.js
10 ms
sprite.png
437 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
31 ms
136 ms
xd_arbiter.php
65 ms
xd_arbiter.php
120 ms
ping
125 ms
slidelive.com accessibility score
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
slidelive.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
slidelive.com SEO score
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Slidelive.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Slidelive.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
slidelive.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Slidelive. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: