Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

sliderwall.com

jQuery image slider - SliderWall

Page Load Speed

2.3 sec in total

First Response

64 ms

Resources Loaded

1.8 sec

Page Rendered

468 ms

sliderwall.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Slider Wall content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about sliderwall.com

SliderWall is a jQuery slider plugin that helps you to create content and image sliders. The plugin is entirely based on HTML5, CSS3 and JavaScript.

Visit sliderwall.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Sliderwall.com page load time and found that the first response time was 64 ms and then it took 2.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

sliderwall.com performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

sliderwall.com

64 ms

www.sliderwall.com

52 ms

generic.gz.css

9 ms

generic.gz.js

12 ms

ga.js

105 ms

Our browser made a total of 69 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 52% of them (36 requests) were addressed to the original Sliderwall.com, 30% (21 requests) were made to Files.jumpeyecomponents.net and 6% (4 requests) were made to Plusone.google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) relates to the external source Files.jumpeyecomponents.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 254.8 kB (29%)

Content Size

868.6 kB

After Optimization

613.7 kB

In fact, the total size of Sliderwall.com main page is 868.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 585.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 12.9 kB

  • Original 16.8 kB
  • After minification 16.1 kB
  • After compression 4.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 12.9 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-15%

Potential reduce by 90.5 kB

  • Original 585.5 kB
  • After minification 495.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Slider Wall needs image optimization as it can save up to 90.5 kB or 15% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-55%

Potential reduce by 133.9 kB

  • Original 242.9 kB
  • After minification 241.4 kB
  • After compression 109.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 133.9 kB or 55% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 17.6 kB

  • Original 23.3 kB
  • After minification 23.3 kB
  • After compression 5.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Sliderwall.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 17.6 kB or 75% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 9 (14%)

Requests Now

66

After Optimization

57

The browser has sent 66 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Slider Wall. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

SEO Factors

sliderwall.com SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sliderwall.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Sliderwall.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Slider Wall. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: