Report Summary

  • 44

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    63% of other websites

  • 78

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 46% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 85

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    56% of websites

snapbill.com

Online Cloud Invoicing Software | Subscription Billing System | SnapBill

Page Load Speed

2.8 sec in total

First Response

410 ms

Resources Loaded

2.2 sec

Page Rendered

206 ms

snapbill.com screenshot

About Website

Visit snapbill.com now to see the best up-to-date Snap Bill content for South Africa and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about snapbill.com

SnapBill is an online cloud invoicing and subscription billing system that automates recurring invoicing and allows you to easily sell and collect payment from your customers.

Visit snapbill.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Snapbill.com page load time and found that the first response time was 410 ms and then it took 2.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

snapbill.com performance score

44

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.6 s

31/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value11.6 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.7 s

36/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value180 ms

91/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.271

45/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.5 s

30/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

shared.css

410 ms

homepage.css

327 ms

jquery.nouislider.css

249 ms

style.css

249 ms

webfont.js

54 ms

Our browser made a total of 66 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 82% of them (54 requests) were addressed to the original Snapbill.com, 12% (8 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Ssl.google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (704 ms) belongs to the original domain Snapbill.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 448.9 kB (42%)

Content Size

1.1 MB

After Optimization

630.5 kB

In fact, the total size of Snapbill.com main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 640.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 28.4 kB

  • Original 34.2 kB
  • After minification 30.1 kB
  • After compression 5.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 4.1 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 28.4 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-20%

Potential reduce by 128.6 kB

  • Original 640.7 kB
  • After minification 512.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Snap Bill needs image optimization as it can save up to 128.6 kB or 20% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-65%

Potential reduce by 158.9 kB

  • Original 245.0 kB
  • After minification 229.1 kB
  • After compression 86.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 158.9 kB or 65% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 133.1 kB

  • Original 159.5 kB
  • After minification 157.8 kB
  • After compression 26.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Snapbill.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 133.1 kB or 83% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 22 (38%)

Requests Now

58

After Optimization

36

The browser has sent 58 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Snap Bill. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

snapbill.com accessibility score

78

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

snapbill.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

snapbill.com SEO score

85

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Snapbill.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Snapbill.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Snap Bill. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: