Tools & Wizards About Us
solinf.lu screenshot

Report Summary

  • 40

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    60% of other websites

  • 95

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 87% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 85

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    56% of websites

solinf.lu

Solution Informatique – Votre Partenaire en Informatique

Page Load Speed

3.2 sec in total

First Response

262 ms

Resources Loaded

2.7 sec

Page Rendered

210 ms

solinf.lu screenshot

About Website

Welcome to solinf.lu homepage info - get ready to check Solinf best content for Luxembourg right away, or after learning these important things about solinf.lu

Votre Partenaire en Informatique

Visit solinf.lu

Key Findings

We analyzed Solinf.lu page load time and found that the first response time was 262 ms and then it took 2.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

solinf.lu performance score

40

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.3 s

3/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value12.2 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.7 s

10/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value360 ms

72/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.007

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.9 s

17/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

solinf.lu

262 ms

www.solution-informatique.lu

754 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

334 ms

font_customizer.min.css

253 ms

style.css

175 ms

Our browser made a total of 80 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Solinf.lu, 56% (45 requests) were made to Solution-informatique.lu and 11% (9 requests) were made to Apis.google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (754 ms) relates to the external source Solution-informatique.lu.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 634.6 kB (60%)

Content Size

1.1 MB

After Optimization

431.7 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Solinf.lu main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 416.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 84.5 kB

  • Original 102.0 kB
  • After minification 99.2 kB
  • After compression 17.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 84.5 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 8.7 kB

  • Original 199.4 kB
  • After minification 190.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Solinf images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-65%

Potential reduce by 226.2 kB

  • Original 348.9 kB
  • After minification 343.2 kB
  • After compression 122.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 226.2 kB or 65% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 315.3 kB

  • Original 416.0 kB
  • After minification 407.9 kB
  • After compression 100.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Solinf.lu needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 315.3 kB or 76% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 53 (71%)

Requests Now

75

After Optimization

22

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 75 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Solinf. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 37 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 18 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

solinf.lu

solinf.lu

262 ms

www.solution-informatique.lu

www.solution-informatique.lu

754 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

334 ms

font_customizer.min.css

font_customizer.min.css

253 ms

style.css

style.css

175 ms

wp-filebase.css

wp-filebase.css

249 ms

style.css

style.css

176 ms

dashicons.min.css

dashicons.min.css

497 ms

desktop_style.css

desktop_style.css

254 ms

fpu-front.min.css

fpu-front.min.css

414 ms

mc-front.min.css

mc-front.min.css

341 ms

tc_common.min.css

tc_common.min.css

667 ms

orange.min.css

orange.min.css

327 ms

style.css

style.css

355 ms

jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.min.css

jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.min.css

360 ms

animate.min.css

animate.min.css

412 ms

genericons.css

genericons.css

438 ms

jetpack.css

jetpack.css

519 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

687 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

495 ms

front_end_script.js

front_end_script.js

517 ms

scrolltext_custom.js

scrolltext_custom.js

517 ms

fpu-front.min.js

fpu-front.min.js

577 ms

holder.js

holder.js

620 ms

jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.min.js

jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.min.js

618 ms

tc-scripts.min.js

tc-scripts.min.js

708 ms

font-customizer-front.min.js

font-customizer-front.min.js

471 ms

devicepx-jetpack.js

devicepx-jetpack.js

5 ms

gprofiles.js

gprofiles.js

57 ms

wpgroho.js

wpgroho.js

514 ms

comment-reply.min.js

comment-reply.min.js

512 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

512 ms

modernizr.min.js

modernizr.min.js

557 ms

effect.min.js

effect.min.js

576 ms

retina.min.js

retina.min.js

607 ms

public.min.js

public.min.js

572 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

572 ms

sharing.js

sharing.js

571 ms

e-201611.js

e-201611.js

5 ms

LogoTrans_.png

LogoTrans_.png

329 ms

loading.gif

loading.gif

329 ms

Genericons.svg

Genericons.svg

308 ms

8AAnjaY2BgYGQAgosrjpwF0ZcUq9bCaABTzgdAAAA=

8AAnjaY2BgYGQAgosrjpwF0ZcUq9bCaABTzgdAAAA=

17 ms

genericons-regular-webfont.woff

genericons-regular-webfont.woff

301 ms

sdk.js

sdk.js

276 ms

widgets.js

widgets.js

22 ms

plusone.js

plusone.js

272 ms

in.js

in.js

26 ms

hovercard.css

hovercard.css

134 ms

services.css

services.css

133 ms

button.0308b81ff1714e446f674b5b9793f2cd.js

button.0308b81ff1714e446f674b5b9793f2cd.js

133 ms

Nouveautes-270x250.jpg

Nouveautes-270x250.jpg

128 ms

5ans-270x250.gif

5ans-270x250.gif

130 ms

NosLogiciels-256x250.png

NosLogiciels-256x250.png

128 ms

NosServices-270x250.jpg

NosServices-270x250.jpg

128 ms

TeamViewerLogoMainPage-270x250.png

TeamViewerLogoMainPage-270x250.png

128 ms

Temoignages-icon-256x250.png

Temoignages-icon-256x250.png

221 ms

g.gif

g.gif

65 ms

cb=gapi.loaded_0

cb=gapi.loaded_0

55 ms

cb=gapi.loaded_1

cb=gapi.loaded_1

54 ms

fastbutton

fastbutton

144 ms

secureAnonymousFramework

secureAnonymousFramework

125 ms

194 ms

postmessageRelay

postmessageRelay

154 ms

xd_arbiter.php

xd_arbiter.php

203 ms

xd_arbiter.php

xd_arbiter.php

339 ms

tweet_button.b9740740e0bcf9b0657c5b11bd4388da.fr.html

tweet_button.b9740740e0bcf9b0657c5b11bd4388da.fr.html

76 ms

rs=AGLTcCMZQMkD3nQb9neyXrDGlfp1IpCqrw

rs=AGLTcCMZQMkD3nQb9neyXrDGlfp1IpCqrw

74 ms

share

share

122 ms

sprite_connect_v14.png

sprite_connect_v14.png

112 ms

cb=gapi.loaded_0

cb=gapi.loaded_0

46 ms

cb=gapi.loaded_1

cb=gapi.loaded_1

45 ms

W5F8_SL0XFawnjxHGsZjJA.ttf

W5F8_SL0XFawnjxHGsZjJA.ttf

66 ms

3193398744-postmessagerelay.js

3193398744-postmessagerelay.js

32 ms

rpc:shindig_random.js

rpc:shindig_random.js

37 ms

cb=gapi.loaded_0

cb=gapi.loaded_0

5 ms

jot

jot

84 ms

share_button.php

share_button.php

85 ms

05-jfvEi0Bv.js

05-jfvEi0Bv.js

301 ms

LVx-xkvaJ0b.png

LVx-xkvaJ0b.png

355 ms

Accessibility Review

solinf.lu accessibility score

95

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

solinf.lu best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

solinf.lu SEO score

85

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    FR

  • Language Claimed

    FR

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Solinf.lu can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that French is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Solinf.lu main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

solinf.lu

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Solinf. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: