7.1 sec in total
1.6 sec
5.2 sec
253 ms
Click here to check amazing Space content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about space.travel
Visit space.travelWe analyzed Space.travel page load time and found that the first response time was 1.6 sec and then it took 5.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
space.travel performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.0 s
23/100
10%
Value22.6 s
0/100
25%
Value9.8 s
10/100
10%
Value2,130 ms
6/100
30%
Value0.154
75/100
15%
Value18.6 s
3/100
10%
1649 ms
93 ms
252 ms
445 ms
252 ms
Our browser made a total of 54 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 85% of them (46 requests) were addressed to the original Space.travel, 6% (3 requests) were made to Youtube.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to S.ytimg.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2 sec) belongs to the original domain Space.travel.
Page size can be reduced by 1.6 MB (43%)
3.7 MB
2.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Space.travel main page is 3.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 49.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 49.7 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Space images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 501.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 501.3 kB or 67% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.1 MB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Space.travel needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.1 MB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 37 (70%)
53
16
The browser has sent 53 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Space. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 28 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
space.travel
1649 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
93 ms
dashicons.min.css
252 ms
jquery-ui-dialog.min.css
445 ms
style.css
252 ms
css
23 ms
styles.css
169 ms
settings.css
179 ms
js_composer.min.css
585 ms
responsive.css
269 ms
font-awesome.min.css
332 ms
font-awesome-social.css
1175 ms
jquery.js
1481 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
417 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
676 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
887 ms
waypoints.min.js
669 ms
waypoints-sticky.min.js
1599 ms
core.min.js
760 ms
widget.min.js
846 ms
mouse.min.js
1219 ms
resizable.min.js
974 ms
draggable.min.js
1340 ms
button.min.js
1184 ms
position.min.js
1259 ms
dialog.min.js
1262 ms
wpdialog.min.js
1304 ms
jquery.form.min.js
1645 ms
scripts.js
1347 ms
effect.min.js
1391 ms
jquery.fancybox.min.js
1423 ms
nv-script.pack.js
1434 ms
comment-reply.min.js
1507 ms
jquery.reflection.js
1511 ms
wp-embed.min.js
1519 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
1568 ms
logost.png
748 ms
break-f.png
257 ms
1.jpg
959 ms
21.jpg
1526 ms
3.jpg
907 ms
41.jpg
1979 ms
image_1366282681232336.jpg
344 ms
wbqpxJDLgBw
279 ms
3a-l1tb1rPg
331 ms
LHJ1G_xGg1U
406 ms
revolution.extension.slideanims.min.js
265 ms
revolution.extension.navigation.min.js
350 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
642 ms
www-embed-player-vflQrT_sR.css
61 ms
www-embed-player.js
87 ms
6BOEML_YqI6cKINK5dmh8ZufcXg7sBa4jeB-I9gQ0xI.js
31 ms
ad_status.js
34 ms
revicons.woff
851 ms
space.travel accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
space.travel best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
space.travel SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Space.travel can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Space.travel main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
space.travel
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Space. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: