Report Summary

  • 91

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    91% of other websites

  • 100

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 97% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    75% of websites

speiermann.net

speiermann.net | Just another WordPress site

Page Load Speed

3.3 sec in total

First Response

1.2 sec

Resources Loaded

1.9 sec

Page Rendered

107 ms

speiermann.net screenshot

About Website

Visit speiermann.net now to see the best up-to-date Speiermann content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about speiermann.net

Visit speiermann.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Speiermann.net page load time and found that the first response time was 1.2 sec and then it took 2.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

speiermann.net performance score

91

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.6 s

64/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.9 s

81/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.2 s

92/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value20 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value2.6 s

98/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

speiermann.net

1206 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

228 ms

css

56 ms

genericons.css

342 ms

style.css

560 ms

Our browser made a total of 13 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 54% of them (7 requests) were addressed to the original Speiermann.net, 31% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 8% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Speiermann.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 164.4 kB (69%)

Content Size

238.9 kB

After Optimization

74.4 kB

In fact, the total size of Speiermann.net main page is 238.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 10% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 123.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-65%

Potential reduce by 4.4 kB

  • Original 6.8 kB
  • After minification 6.4 kB
  • After compression 2.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 4.4 kB or 65% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-66%

Potential reduce by 81.2 kB

  • Original 123.6 kB
  • After minification 121.7 kB
  • After compression 42.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 81.2 kB or 66% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-73%

Potential reduce by 78.9 kB

  • Original 108.5 kB
  • After minification 89.1 kB
  • After compression 29.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Speiermann.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 78.9 kB or 73% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 3 (43%)

Requests Now

7

After Optimization

4

The browser has sent 7 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Speiermann. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

speiermann.net accessibility score

100

Accessibility Issues

Best Practices

speiermann.net best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

speiermann.net SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    DA

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Speiermann.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed Danish language. Our system also found out that Speiermann.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Speiermann. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: