Report Summary

  • 30

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    50% of other websites

  • 83

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 56% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 89

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    67% of websites

starrflight.com

FOB Archery - Most Innovative Arrow Fletching Product

Page Load Speed

3.9 sec in total

First Response

189 ms

Resources Loaded

3.3 sec

Page Rendered

380 ms

starrflight.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to starrflight.com homepage info - get ready to check Starrflight best content right away, or after learning these important things about starrflight.com

FOB is an innovative arrow fletching product that provides a number of advantages over other fletchings, vanes and feathers in the archery industry.

Visit starrflight.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Starrflight.com page load time and found that the first response time was 189 ms and then it took 3.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

starrflight.com performance score

30

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.0 s

9/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value28.3 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value10.8 s

7/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value830 ms

35/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.012

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.8 s

28/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.starrflight.com

189 ms

jY5BDsIwDAQ_RGT1xHMq1zElUhJHtqPS3xOgICQuXHdm7Z2g8s1XrmHFnFl3aCqxkxu0q7iQoqf5cKAMlNnenfnozDFZy7iD-bDpBytndI5zKriynSbwvnBTNgNTgoKpwsYL0Ag-aGgk1ZE8XERLOEOqlHsc7x-e-Z6ftzYRklJYiQHN2F_8Kw5jmnT_z7UyRhspc70D.css

36 ms

M9Qvz89Pzs_NTS1KTtVPLC5OLSnWTy4uRhYGAA.css

69 ms

nY9LDsMgDEQvFOrmRJHBboLkAMImaW5fpNIuuuxyfk-aGZAOTIHJVdaSk8aD3RGJs-PdMxFXKM1LDICqbApBdTjTDIZeuPTp2yd-YBO77TFNd9hasj5Xu4R7N_HTVk5uRRGuF5SaqYVOLFu2HCpaXEYH9h4JK5yRVraO6GEYSv9kDb141BiWz3KgVfpn3fL5U_v6Lw.css

103 ms

NcvRCsAgCEDRLxqyL5JW4gKXoQbr79dDe77nntDoDaZ2cBIhm9BNy8jh0G8NzZai4jbwrCTk_4P7wVK9S5rgsXSGsMpMhteI0OYf.css

80 ms

Our browser made a total of 96 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 68% of them (65 requests) were addressed to the original Starrflight.com, 10% (10 requests) were made to Static.xx.fbcdn.net and 9% (9 requests) were made to Scontent.xx.fbcdn.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (482 ms) belongs to the original domain Starrflight.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 733.0 kB (44%)

Content Size

1.7 MB

After Optimization

946.1 kB

In fact, the total size of Starrflight.com main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 710.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 24.2 kB

  • Original 31.1 kB
  • After minification 29.2 kB
  • After compression 6.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 24.2 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 17.2 kB

  • Original 710.3 kB
  • After minification 693.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Starrflight images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-63%

Potential reduce by 304.2 kB

  • Original 479.5 kB
  • After minification 466.3 kB
  • After compression 175.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 304.2 kB or 63% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 387.4 kB

  • Original 458.1 kB
  • After minification 406.4 kB
  • After compression 70.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Starrflight.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 387.4 kB or 85% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 53 (57%)

Requests Now

93

After Optimization

40

The browser has sent 93 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Starrflight. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 38 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

starrflight.com accessibility score

83

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

starrflight.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

starrflight.com SEO score

89

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Starrflight.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Starrflight.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Starrflight. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: