2.8 sec in total
266 ms
1.9 sec
565 ms
Visit steeg.co.uk now to see the best up-to-date Steeg content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about steeg.co.uk
Home tutoring for KS3 and GCSE in Maths, Science and Technology. CPD for teachers. Support for electronic circuit design and 3D printing.
Visit steeg.co.ukWe analyzed Steeg.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 266 ms and then it took 2.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
steeg.co.uk performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value12.7 s
0/100
10%
Value16.8 s
0/100
25%
Value17.3 s
0/100
10%
Value630 ms
47/100
30%
Value1.992
0/100
15%
Value20.6 s
2/100
10%
266 ms
9 ms
347 ms
140 ms
163 ms
Our browser made a total of 100 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Steeg.co.uk, 24% (24 requests) were made to Pixel.wp.com and 11% (11 requests) were made to S0.wp.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1000 ms) relates to the external source I1.wp.com.
Page size can be reduced by 747.7 kB (58%)
1.3 MB
530.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Steeg.co.uk main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 831.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 109.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 109.9 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Steeg images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 603.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 603.6 kB or 73% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 32.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Steeg.co.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 32.4 kB or 64% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 66 (72%)
92
26
The browser has sent 92 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Steeg. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 32 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
steeg.co.uk
266 ms
dandtfordandt.wordpress.com
9 ms
dandtfordandt.wordpress.com
347 ms
style.css
140 ms
163 ms
169 ms
style.css
162 ms
gprofiles.js
317 ms
wpgroho.js
165 ms
164 ms
jetpack-carousel.css
167 ms
tiled-gallery.css
165 ms
177 ms
widgets.js
175 ms
164 ms
725X1342.skimlinks.js
426 ms
w.js
174 ms
merriweather.css
24 ms
cropped-file8711235618144.jpg
503 ms
search.png
113 ms
124498.jpg
1000 ms
orange-small.png
92 ms
rss.png
361 ms
loading.gif
81 ms
comment-bubble.png
80 ms
wear-it.png
554 ms
robotics-tb.png
620 ms
tg.png
607 ms
ofqual-consultation-2015.png
607 ms
harris-ppt-image.png
607 ms
Genericons.svg
67 ms
8AAnjaY2BgYGQAgosrjpwF0ZcUq9bCaABTzgdAAAA=
15 ms
master.html
394 ms
Noticons.svg
213 ms
BaABdRAi2AAAA
46 ms
merriweather-bold-webfont.ttf
221 ms
merriweather-regular-webfont.ttf
198 ms
merriweather-light-webfont.ttf
282 ms
316 ms
hovercard.css
170 ms
services.css
279 ms
share
293 ms
g.gif
289 ms
count.json
389 ms
graph.facebook.com
446 ms
share
344 ms
count.json
389 ms
graph.facebook.com
570 ms
share
379 ms
count.json
392 ms
graph.facebook.com
626 ms
share
381 ms
count.json
388 ms
graph.facebook.com
650 ms
share
381 ms
count.json
383 ms
graph.facebook.com
648 ms
share
374 ms
count.json
384 ms
graph.facebook.com
604 ms
share
371 ms
count.json
392 ms
graph.facebook.com
642 ms
button.0308b81ff1714e446f674b5b9793f2cd.js
131 ms
g.gif
224 ms
g.gif
224 ms
g.gif
227 ms
g.gif
224 ms
g.gif
227 ms
g.gif
228 ms
g.gif
230 ms
g.gif
230 ms
g.gif
230 ms
g.gif
266 ms
g.gif
266 ms
g.gif
278 ms
g.gif
286 ms
g.gif
286 ms
g.gif
286 ms
g.gif
295 ms
g.gif
292 ms
g.gif
296 ms
g.gif
301 ms
g.gif
300 ms
g.gif
297 ms
g.gif
297 ms
g.gif
297 ms
follow_button.b9740740e0bcf9b0657c5b11bd4388da.en.html
75 ms
jquery.js
44 ms
postmessage.js
35 ms
jed.js
33 ms
underscore.min.js
34 ms
jquery.wpcom-proxy-request.js
6 ms
34 ms
jot
108 ms
3 ms
likes-rest.js
12 ms
link
45 ms
track.php
82 ms
batch
103 ms
steeg.co.uk accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
steeg.co.uk best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
steeg.co.uk SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Steeg.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Steeg.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
steeg.co.uk
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Steeg. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: