5.1 sec in total
1.9 sec
2.6 sec
605 ms
Click here to check amazing Stethoscope Reviews content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about stethoscope-reviews.com
Stethoscope Reviews - DO NOT BUY A Stethoscope before reading our expert provided reviews of the best stethoscope in each medical category.
Visit stethoscope-reviews.comWe analyzed Stethoscope-reviews.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.9 sec and then it took 3.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
stethoscope-reviews.com performance score
1904 ms
278 ms
174 ms
682 ms
158 ms
Our browser made a total of 57 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 77% of them (44 requests) were addressed to the original Stethoscope-reviews.com, 4% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Apis.google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Stethoscope-reviews.com.
Page size can be reduced by 252.1 kB (46%)
552.9 kB
300.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Stethoscope-reviews.com main page is 552.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 247.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 44.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 44.6 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 18.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Stethoscope Reviews images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 153.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 153.9 kB or 62% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 35.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Stethoscope-reviews.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 35.1 kB or 81% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 30 (54%)
56
26
The browser has sent 56 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Stethoscope Reviews. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
stethoscope-reviews.com
1904 ms
blue.php
278 ms
style.css
174 ms
myrp-hotlink-css.php
682 ms
jquery.rating.css
158 ms
global.css
165 ms
styles.css
262 ms
wp-socializer-buttons-css.css
259 ms
jquery.js
447 ms
myrp-hotlink-js.php
772 ms
jquery.MetaData.js
338 ms
jquery.rating.pack.js
346 ms
jtip.js
427 ms
tw-sack.min.js
421 ms
ga.js
11 ms
__utm.gif
11 ms
widgets.js
44 ms
all.js
57 ms
plusone.js
81 ms
pinit.js
76 ms
dots.png
85 ms
bg-fade.png
82 ms
light.png
145 ms
bg.png
82 ms
header-blue.png
145 ms
menu-left.png
148 ms
menu-right.png
148 ms
menubg.png
150 ms
rss.png
215 ms
rightnew.png
222 ms
leftnew.png
230 ms
side.png
223 ms
1.png
255 ms
default-star.png
288 ms
2.png
294 ms
3.png
295 ms
4.png
304 ms
5.png
319 ms
littmann-cardiology-III-stethoscope.png
423 ms
big-default-star.png
359 ms
Littmann-Lightweight-II-S.E.-Stethoscope-223x300.jpg
359 ms
Littmann-Classic-II-SE.png
429 ms
Littmann-Master-Classic-II-Stethoscope.jpg
372 ms
183 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
3 ms
pinit_main.js
36 ms
Littmann-Master-Cardiology-Stethoscope-review.jpg
143 ms
Stethoscope-Reviews.jpg
174 ms
jquery.form.min.js
171 ms
scripts.js
191 ms
wp-socializer-bookmark-js.js
192 ms
link.gif
218 ms
footerdark.png
226 ms
piwik.js
142 ms
piwik.php
566 ms
xd_arbiter.php
20 ms
xd_arbiter.php
27 ms
stethoscope-reviews.com SEO score
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Stethoscope-reviews.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Stethoscope-reviews.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
stethoscope-reviews.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Stethoscope Reviews. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: