1.8 sec in total
59 ms
1.3 sec
450 ms
Click here to check amazing Studio Science content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about studioscience.com
Studio Science is a design & innovation consultancy. We help technology companies connect with people, developing better perspectives and smarter solutions.
Visit studioscience.comWe analyzed Studioscience.com page load time and found that the first response time was 59 ms and then it took 1.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
studioscience.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.9 s
51/100
10%
Value0
0/100
25%
Value5.9 s
47/100
10%
Value870 ms
33/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value8.0 s
43/100
10%
59 ms
16 ms
63 ms
60 ms
174 ms
Our browser made a total of 60 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 38% of them (23 requests) were addressed to the original Studioscience.com, 18% (11 requests) were made to Use.typekit.net and 7% (4 requests) were made to F.vimeocdn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (620 ms) belongs to the original domain Studioscience.com.
Page size can be reduced by 785.6 kB (33%)
2.4 MB
1.6 MB
In fact, the total size of Studioscience.com main page is 2.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 21.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 21.3 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 127.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Studio Science images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 351.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 351.4 kB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 285.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Studioscience.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 285.2 kB or 87% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 30 (64%)
47
17
The browser has sent 47 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Studio Science. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
studioscience.com
59 ms
style.css
16 ms
ss-social.css
63 ms
ss-standard.css
60 ms
qhd5ixe.js
174 ms
styles.css
61 ms
jetpack.css
68 ms
collect.js
69 ms
jquery.min.js
71 ms
jquery.form.min.js
67 ms
scripts.js
67 ms
devicepx-jetpack.js
69 ms
wp-embed.min.js
67 ms
e-201611.js
6 ms
plugins.js
65 ms
scripts.js
67 ms
studioscience.com
136 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
101 ms
track_page_view
152 ms
154353584
372 ms
117629463
377 ms
logo.svg
130 ms
logo-mobile.svg
123 ms
logo-mobile-white.svg
127 ms
Dv7igMv5FL2FLurl36BXW_7w9GvHOvs3bE9pJa-eZOQ.png
465 ms
Hero_MobileEnterprise_V21.jpg
359 ms
Thumbnail.png
620 ms
reel-poster.png
338 ms
smartling-cover.jpg
338 ms
VFZvVzA8PWUZvdI2cx7NyyMcvPHhWAcQooUzYNhzzUXffVz3gsMdeMJ6Mk6g5Msfb2iRZeFKF2sKZQsyFhsK526aFhZcjQmRw2M3FhJtZebtFRmKwh4KjDwtwD6DwAZ8wcmywQSaZRjkwR9ajQqU5QI.woff
296 ms
R9WLu2IS8eEY6EYUIckhHVYRSEBcxYMhjV-YWqnbdA9ffVa3gsMdeMJ6Mk6g5Mmfb2iRZeFKF2sKZQsyFhsK526aFhZcjQmRw2M3FhJtZebtFRmKwh4KjDwtwD6DwAZ8wcmywQSaZRjkwR9ajQqU5QI.woff
368 ms
9TRAxIVfpz6YoJEZ7Pqnn_zHo6QgcF51ywBXhhe_LASffV13gsMdeMJ6Mk6g5MFfb2iRZeFKF2sKZQsyFhsK526aFhZcjQmRw2M3FhJtZebtFRmKwh4KjDwtwD6DwAZ8wcmywQSaZRjkwR9ajQqU5QI.woff
415 ms
OESbyOmCV12yEoBtxv6V_C8ddZ58sNP-qLyWMU9fzAGffVx3gsMdeMJ6Mk6g5Mifb2iRZeFKF2sKZQsyFhsK526aFhZcjQmRw2M3FhJtZebtFRmKwh4KjDwtwD6DwAZ8wcmywQSaZRjkwR9ajQqU5QI.woff
415 ms
oDe2YbaBC3mdpdc6BHsyiswmb15-dSlU9iCnxZ8iQIbffJYUgsMdeMJ6Mk6g5M8fb2iRZeFKF2sKZQsyFhsK526aFhZcjQmRw2M3FhJtZebtFRmKwh4KjDwtwD6DwAZ8wcmywQSaZRjkwR9ajQqU5QI.woff
414 ms
ss-standard.woff
243 ms
ss-social-circle.woff
244 ms
ss-social-regular.woff
244 ms
widgets.js
272 ms
analytics.js
226 ms
g.gif
28 ms
EXgMEAlUONnj5P3XFRWdfu2Ev2Yq52iVo2ieNv17PhIffVn3gsMdeMJ6Mk6g5Mufb2iRZeFKF2sKZQsyFhsK526aFhZcjQmRw2M3FhJtZebtFRmKwh4KjDwtwD6DwAZ8wcmywQSaZRjkwR9ajQqU5QI.woff
196 ms
89PMdDDvK3jEiTT41N7kxlLNDG1Vq_JdqJ263RpdtqtffVD3gsMdeMJ6Mk6g5Mofb2iRZeFKF2sKZQsyFhsK526aFhZcjQmRw2M3FhJtZebtFRmKwh4KjDwtwD6DwAZ8wcmywQSaZRjkwR9ajQqU5QI.woff
239 ms
U1-6qhGN0M7ijNsiJ8_yELUZos88hSdzZiaNE6FmqEwffV_3gsMdeMJ6Mk6g5MNfb2iRZeFKF2sKZQsyFhsK526aFhZcjQmRw2M3FhJtZebtFRmKwh4KjDwtwD6DwAZ8wcmywQSaZRjkwR9ajQqU5QI.woff
283 ms
n_ZoTKCQv_9tfXDKv4YRZMPKBpo9O2VET0HCFIv139jffJOUgsMdeMJ6Mk6g5gFfb2iRZeFKF2sKZQsyFhsK526aFhZcjQmRw2M3FhJtZebtFRmKwh4KjDwtwD6DwAZ8wcmywQSaZRjkwR9ajQqU5QI.woff
283 ms
player.js
264 ms
player.css
248 ms
ga.js
262 ms
vuid.min.js
264 ms
collect
86 ms
button.0308b81ff1714e446f674b5b9793f2cd.js
33 ms
timeline.d11f7a3b3287fb94220e8ee6d03cc772.js
67 ms
p.gif
331 ms
syndication
244 ms
440616160849960960
295 ms
follow_button.b9740740e0bcf9b0657c5b11bd4388da.en.html
177 ms
__utm.gif
127 ms
proxy.html
71 ms
504401878.jpg
108 ms
__utm.gif
39 ms
554888848.jpg
73 ms
studioscience.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
studioscience.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
studioscience.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Studioscience.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Studioscience.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
studioscience.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Studio Science. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: