Report Summary

  • 92

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    92% of other websites

  • 98

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 94% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 88

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    66% of websites

successandfailure.net

successandfailure.net - successandfailure Resources and Information.

Page Load Speed

1.7 sec in total

First Response

384 ms

Resources Loaded

997 ms

Page Rendered

335 ms

successandfailure.net screenshot

About Website

Visit successandfailure.net now to see the best up-to-date Successandfailure content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about successandfailure.net

successandfailure.net is your first and best source for all of the information you’re looking for. From general topics to more of what you would expect to find here, successandfailure.net has it all. ...

Visit successandfailure.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Successandfailure.net page load time and found that the first response time was 384 ms and then it took 1.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

successandfailure.net performance score

92

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.6 s

63/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.8 s

84/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.9 s

94/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value2.6 s

98/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

successandfailure.net

384 ms

ga.js

31 ms

__utm.gif

23 ms

Sidenav-160x1245.jpg

90 ms

Blog-Box-Medium-150x358.jpg

151 ms

Our browser made a total of 43 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 84% of them (36 requests) were addressed to the original Successandfailure.net, 5% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 5% (2 requests) were made to Google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (612 ms) belongs to the original domain Successandfailure.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 36.0 kB (23%)

Content Size

153.9 kB

After Optimization

117.9 kB

In fact, the total size of Successandfailure.net main page is 153.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 104.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 25.4 kB

  • Original 31.7 kB
  • After minification 29.3 kB
  • After compression 6.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 25.4 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-10%

Potential reduce by 10.2 kB

  • Original 104.3 kB
  • After minification 94.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Successandfailure images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 383 B

  • Original 17.8 kB
  • After minification 17.7 kB
  • After compression 17.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 21 (51%)

Requests Now

41

After Optimization

20

The browser has sent 41 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Successandfailure. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

successandfailure.net accessibility score

98

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

successandfailure.net best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

successandfailure.net SEO score

88

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    N/A

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Successandfailure.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Successandfailure.net main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Successandfailure. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: