3.7 sec in total
411 ms
2.8 sec
486 ms
Click here to check amazing Suffolk Online content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about suffolkonline.net
Visit suffolkonline.netWe analyzed Suffolkonline.net page load time and found that the first response time was 411 ms and then it took 3.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
suffolkonline.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value10.8 s
0/100
10%
Value24.4 s
0/100
25%
Value18.0 s
0/100
10%
Value220 ms
88/100
30%
Value0.053
98/100
15%
Value18.2 s
3/100
10%
411 ms
76 ms
155 ms
152 ms
154 ms
Our browser made a total of 77 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 81% of them (62 requests) were addressed to the original Suffolkonline.net, 14% (11 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (983 ms) belongs to the original domain Suffolkonline.net.
Page size can be reduced by 940.2 kB (14%)
6.6 MB
5.7 MB
In fact, the total size of Suffolkonline.net main page is 6.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 5.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 26.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 26.1 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 373.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Suffolk Online images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 424.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 424.2 kB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 116.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Suffolkonline.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 116.3 kB or 69% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 44 (68%)
65
21
The browser has sent 65 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Suffolk Online. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 29 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.suffolkonline.net
411 ms
style.css
76 ms
events_manager.css
155 ms
main.css
152 ms
jquery-ui.min.css
154 ms
dashicons.min.css
242 ms
thickbox.css
165 ms
jquery.js
246 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
223 ms
core.min.js
226 ms
widget.min.js
225 ms
position.min.js
242 ms
mouse.min.js
296 ms
sortable.min.js
299 ms
datepicker.min.js
299 ms
menu.min.js
318 ms
autocomplete.min.js
320 ms
resizable.min.js
322 ms
draggable.min.js
369 ms
button.min.js
372 ms
dialog.min.js
373 ms
events-manager.js
397 ms
selectmenu.min.js
397 ms
main.js
486 ms
add-to-cart.min.js
440 ms
jquery.blockUI.min.js
443 ms
woocommerce.min.js
444 ms
jquery.cookie.min.js
474 ms
cart-fragments.min.js
475 ms
thickbox.js
512 ms
slick.min.js
516 ms
jquery.sticky-kit.min.js
514 ms
mainscript.js
552 ms
wp-embed.min.js
552 ms
css
78 ms
css
91 ms
reset.css
502 ms
main.css
526 ms
slick.css
529 ms
responsive.css
530 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
84 ms
ga.js
20 ms
header_logo.jpg
162 ms
electricity-705670-2000x1329.jpg
449 ms
laptop-762548-2000x1333.jpg
487 ms
mobile-616012-2000x1328.jpg
453 ms
person-woman-hand-apple-2000x1333.jpg
492 ms
fingerPointing2.jpg
983 ms
latest-news-block-2-500x360.jpg
299 ms
whitefade.png
301 ms
icon.broadband.png
403 ms
icon.support.png
444 ms
icon.design.png
519 ms
icon.hosting.png
520 ms
spacer_30x2_white.png
523 ms
greenfield.jpg
562 ms
total_computers.jpg
569 ms
uk2.jpg
591 ms
netgear_powershift.jpg
592 ms
channelhost.jpg
596 ms
phonecoop.jpg
641 ms
www.suffolkonline.net
564 ms
partner_prev.png
495 ms
partner_next.png
510 ms
loadingAnimation.gif
511 ms
__utm.gif
20 ms
HqHm7BVC_nzzTui2lzQTDaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
44 ms
Y_TKV6o8WovbUd3m_X9aAA.ttf
67 ms
bH7276GfdCjMjApa_dkG6aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
66 ms
-_Ctzj9b56b8RgXW8FAriS3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
66 ms
8KhZd3VQBtXTAznvKjw-ky3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
67 ms
RJMlAoFXXQEzZoMSUteGWKCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
67 ms
bIcY3_3JNqUVRAQQRNVteQ.ttf
67 ms
xkvoNo9fC8O2RDydKj12by3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
98 ms
JbtMzqLaYbbbCL9X6EvaIy3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
95 ms
1ImRNPx4870-D9a1EBUdPC3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
94 ms
PKCRbVvRfd5n7BTjtGiFZC3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
93 ms
suffolkonline.net accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
ARIA input fields do not have accessible names
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
suffolkonline.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
suffolkonline.net SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Suffolkonline.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Suffolkonline.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
suffolkonline.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Suffolk Online. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: