Report Summary

  • 33

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    53% of other websites

  • 85

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 60% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 84

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    53% of websites

uritoxml.sf.net

Compare Free Open Source Software

Page Load Speed

5.1 sec in total

First Response

60 ms

Resources Loaded

4.7 sec

Page Rendered

368 ms

uritoxml.sf.net screenshot

About Website

Welcome to uritoxml.sf.net homepage info - get ready to check Uritoxml Sf best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about uritoxml.sf.net

uri/text/url to xml and back download. uri/text/url to xml and back 2012-03-31 06:48:06 free download. uri/text/url to xml and back uri/text/url to xml and back

Visit uritoxml.sf.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Uritoxml.sf.net page load time and found that the first response time was 60 ms and then it took 5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

uritoxml.sf.net performance score

33

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.5 s

6/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.5 s

8/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.7 s

16/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value680 ms

44/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.1 s

9/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

uritoxml.sf.net

60 ms

59 ms

510 ms

tag.aspx

29 ms

sf.head.js

283 ms

Our browser made a total of 107 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Uritoxml.sf.net, 18% (19 requests) were made to Secure.flashtalking.com and 15% (16 requests) were made to A.fsdn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (678 ms) relates to the external source Pixel.mathtag.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.0 MB (65%)

Content Size

1.6 MB

After Optimization

552.4 kB

In fact, the total size of Uritoxml.sf.net main page is 1.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 690.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 226.8 kB

  • Original 301.2 kB
  • After minification 293.8 kB
  • After compression 74.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 226.8 kB or 75% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 7.1 kB

  • Original 170.6 kB
  • After minification 163.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Uritoxml Sf images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-65%

Potential reduce by 448.7 kB

  • Original 690.7 kB
  • After minification 677.2 kB
  • After compression 242.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 448.7 kB or 65% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 339.7 kB

  • Original 412.3 kB
  • After minification 409.8 kB
  • After compression 72.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Uritoxml.sf.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 339.7 kB or 82% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 62 (62%)

Requests Now

100

After Optimization

38

The browser has sent 100 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Uritoxml Sf. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 50 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

uritoxml.sf.net accessibility score

85

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

uritoxml.sf.net best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

uritoxml.sf.net SEO score

84

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Uritoxml.sf.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Uritoxml.sf.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Uritoxml Sf. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: