Tools & Wizards About Us
tastescan.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

tastescan.com

tastescan.com

Page Load Speed

1.6 sec in total

First Response

272 ms

Resources Loaded

1.2 sec

Page Rendered

104 ms

tastescan.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to tastescan.com homepage info - get ready to check Tastescan best content right away, or after learning these important things about tastescan.com

Forsale Lander

Visit tastescan.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Tastescan.com page load time and found that the first response time was 272 ms and then it took 1.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

tastescan.com performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

tastescan.com

272 ms

97 ms

site.css

92 ms

jquery-1.8.3.min.js

457 ms

m.js

189 ms

Our browser made a total of 30 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 93% of them (28 requests) were addressed to the original Tastescan.com, 7% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (457 ms) belongs to the original domain Tastescan.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 186.0 kB (63%)

Content Size

296.9 kB

After Optimization

110.9 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Tastescan.com main page is 296.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 179.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-69%

Potential reduce by 5.9 kB

  • Original 8.5 kB
  • After minification 8.2 kB
  • After compression 2.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 5.9 kB or 69% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-51%

Potential reduce by 49.4 kB

  • Original 97.0 kB
  • After minification 47.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Tastescan needs image optimization as it can save up to 49.4 kB or 51% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-67%

Potential reduce by 120.6 kB

  • Original 179.1 kB
  • After minification 160.7 kB
  • After compression 58.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 120.6 kB or 67% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 10.1 kB

  • Original 12.2 kB
  • After minification 8.2 kB
  • After compression 2.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Tastescan.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 10.1 kB or 82% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 3 (11%)

Requests Now

28

After Optimization

25

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 28 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Tastescan. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

tastescan.com

tastescan.com

272 ms

97 ms

site.css

site.css

92 ms

jquery-1.8.3.min.js

jquery-1.8.3.min.js

457 ms

m.js

m.js

189 ms

home.css

home.css

189 ms

jquery.simplemodal.1.4.3.min.js

jquery.simplemodal.1.4.3.min.js

192 ms

beta.png

beta.png

96 ms

tastescanlogosmall.png

tastescanlogosmall.png

97 ms

chevronleft.png

chevronleft.png

100 ms

home-flat.png

home-flat.png

99 ms

search-flat.png

search-flat.png

101 ms

films.png

films.png

178 ms

music.png

music.png

188 ms

games.png

games.png

193 ms

books.png

books.png

189 ms

android_logo.png

android_logo.png

191 ms

apple_logo.png

apple_logo.png

192 ms

rate-review.png

rate-review.png

282 ms

following.png

following.png

284 ms

trending.png

trending.png

278 ms

friends.png

friends.png

279 ms

news.png

news.png

283 ms

plant.png

plant.png

282 ms

about.png

about.png

368 ms

profile.png

profile.png

368 ms

favouries.png

favouries.png

370 ms

suggest.png

suggest.png

369 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

5 ms

collect

collect

12 ms

SEO Factors

tastescan.com SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Tastescan.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Tastescan.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

tastescan.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Tastescan. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: