Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

technologyspectator.com.au

technologyspectator.com.au

Page Load Speed

4.5 sec in total

First Response

546 ms

Resources Loaded

3.7 sec

Page Rendered

225 ms

technologyspectator.com.au screenshot

About Website

Visit technologyspectator.com.au now to see the best up-to-date Technologyspectator content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about technologyspectator.com.au

Visit technologyspectator.com.au

Key Findings

We analyzed Technologyspectator.com.au page load time and found that the first response time was 546 ms and then it took 3.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

technologyspectator.com.au performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

technology

546 ms

CommentCount.js

41 ms

css_VLSlo_yb6g5wvvDTHW3Np9IoZPOy5LSAV-RnzepQK7A.css

234 ms

css_riVar5ehcji-rxYssGP0tteHM0-S-jrVuK3KqHjCqf4.css

461 ms

jquery.qtip.min.css

20 ms

Our browser made a total of 175 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Technologyspectator.com.au, 17% (30 requests) were made to Businessspectator.com.au and 10% (17 requests) were made to Tags.tiqcdn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (988 ms) relates to the external source Identityssl.newscdn.com.au.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.4 MB (44%)

Content Size

3.2 MB

After Optimization

1.8 MB

In fact, the total size of Technologyspectator.com.au main page is 3.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 1.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 79.4 kB

  • Original 98.7 kB
  • After minification 91.9 kB
  • After compression 19.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 79.4 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 20.7 kB

  • Original 1.2 MB
  • After minification 1.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Technologyspectator images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-65%

Potential reduce by 984.5 kB

  • Original 1.5 MB
  • After minification 1.5 MB
  • After compression 537.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 984.5 kB or 65% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 324.5 kB

  • Original 387.0 kB
  • After minification 381.0 kB
  • After compression 62.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Technologyspectator.com.au needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 324.5 kB or 84% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 98 (61%)

Requests Now

160

After Optimization

62

The browser has sent 160 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Technologyspectator. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 69 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

SEO Factors

technologyspectator.com.au SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Technologyspectator.com.au can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Technologyspectator.com.au main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Technologyspectator. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: