Tools & Wizards About Us
testseek.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 19

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    36% of other websites

  • 77

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 45% of websites

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 98

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    92% of websites

testseek.com

Product reviews and ratings in one place • Testseek

Page Load Speed

53.3 sec in total

First Response

166 ms

Resources Loaded

40.9 sec

Page Rendered

12.2 sec

testseek.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to testseek.com homepage info - get ready to check Testseek best content for Ukraine right away, or after learning these important things about testseek.com

Testseek review products • We help to attain customer loyalty and sell more by enabling Expert reviews, Consumer reviews, and Product ratings

Visit testseek.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Testseek.com page load time and found that the first response time was 166 ms and then it took 53.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

testseek.com performance score

19

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.4 s

2/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value12.7 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.3 s

13/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,820 ms

9/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.088

92/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value16.9 s

5/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

testseek.com

166 ms

3145 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

1420 ms

styles.css

1384 ms

go_pricing_styles.css

1661 ms

Our browser made a total of 59 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 68% of them (40 requests) were addressed to the original Testseek.com, 17% (10 requests) were made to Maps.googleapis.com and 5% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (10.5 sec) relates to the external source Google.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 3.2 MB (75%)

Content Size

4.3 MB

After Optimization

1.1 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Testseek.com main page is 4.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 1.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 603.3 kB

  • Original 696.1 kB
  • After minification 694.7 kB
  • After compression 92.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 603.3 kB or 87% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 16.4 kB

  • Original 218.4 kB
  • After minification 202.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Testseek images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-68%

Potential reduce by 1.3 MB

  • Original 1.9 MB
  • After minification 1.8 MB
  • After compression 606.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 1.3 MB or 68% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 1.3 MB

  • Original 1.5 MB
  • After minification 1.4 MB
  • After compression 176.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Testseek.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.3 MB or 88% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 33 (65%)

Requests Now

51

After Optimization

18

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 51 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Testseek. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 24 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

testseek.com

testseek.com

166 ms

3145 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

1420 ms

styles.css

styles.css

1384 ms

go_pricing_styles.css

go_pricing_styles.css

1661 ms

settings.css

settings.css

1900 ms

js_composer.min.css

js_composer.min.css

2592 ms

css

css

1878 ms

main.min.css

main.min.css

2017 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

2328 ms

fontello.css

fontello.css

791 ms

style.css

style.css

2453 ms

ultimate.min.css

ultimate.min.css

2688 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

2376 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

2374 ms

jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js

jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js

2375 ms

jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js

jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js

2608 ms

above-the-fold.min.js

above-the-fold.min.js

2607 ms

ultimate.min.js

ultimate.min.js

3869 ms

tooltip.min.css

tooltip.min.css

2511 ms

jquery.form.min.js

jquery.form.min.js

2574 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

3682 ms

main.min.js

main.min.js

3932 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

3835 ms

js_composer_front.min.js

js_composer_front.min.js

3930 ms

tooltip.min.js

tooltip.min.js

3930 ms

Defaults.css

Defaults.css

3495 ms

zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf

zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf

3706 ms

RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

3920 ms

stuff-uk-logo.png

stuff-uk-logo.png

2476 ms

W4wDsBUluyw0tK3tykhXEfesZW2xOQ-xsNqO47m55DA.ttf

W4wDsBUluyw0tK3tykhXEfesZW2xOQ-xsNqO47m55DA.ttf

278 ms

embed

embed

10496 ms

bg4_1920_800.jpg

bg4_1920_800.jpg

7944 ms

bg2_1920_800.jpg

bg2_1920_800.jpg

1021 ms

ajax-loader.gif

ajax-loader.gif

1020 ms

tslogo_300_86.png

tslogo_300_86.png

1020 ms

tslogo_200_67.png

tslogo_200_67.png

1018 ms

samsung_bw_180x120.png

samsung_bw_180x120.png

943 ms

intel_bw_180x120.png

intel_bw_180x120.png

1236 ms

kyocera_bw_180x120.png

kyocera_bw_180x120.png

1214 ms

nuance_bw_180x120.png

nuance_bw_180x120.png

1212 ms

plextor_bw_180x120.png

plextor_bw_180x120.png

1105 ms

kagoo_bw_180x120.png

kagoo_bw_180x120.png

1105 ms

js

js

2417 ms

init_embed.js

init_embed.js

2308 ms

fontello.woff

fontello.woff

817 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

2124 ms

widget_v2.213.js

widget_v2.213.js

3922 ms

common.js

common.js

2146 ms

map.js

map.js

2213 ms

google4.png

google4.png

1165 ms

overlay.js

overlay.js

1056 ms

util.js

util.js

392 ms

stats.js

stats.js

325 ms

onion.js

onion.js

195 ms

search_impl.js

search_impl.js

154 ms

StaticMapService.GetMapImage

StaticMapService.GetMapImage

2901 ms

openhand_8_8.cur

openhand_8_8.cur

2373 ms

AuthenticationService.Authenticate

AuthenticationService.Authenticate

1382 ms

Accessibility Review

testseek.com accessibility score

77

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

SEO Factors

testseek.com SEO score

98

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Testseek.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Testseek.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

testseek.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Testseek. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: