Tools & Wizards About Us
textalytics.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 16

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    30% of other websites

  • 95

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 87% of websites

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

textalytics.com

Text Analytics – MeaningCloud text mining solutions

Page Load Speed

1.1 sec in total

First Response

115 ms

Resources Loaded

659 ms

Page Rendered

301 ms

textalytics.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Text Alytics content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about textalytics.com

TEXT ANALYTICS. MeaningCloud market-leading solutions for text mining and voice of the customer. Register now on our website to discover our text API

Visit textalytics.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Textalytics.com page load time and found that the first response time was 115 ms and then it took 960 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

textalytics.com performance score

16

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.1 s

8/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value14.3 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value12.0 s

4/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value700 ms

43/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value1.247

1/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.5 s

18/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

textalytics.com

115 ms

meaningcloud.com

169 ms

language-selector.css

38 ms

bootstrap.min.css

23 ms

blog.css

11 ms

Our browser made a total of 52 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Textalytics.com, 88% (46 requests) were made to Meaningcloud.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Html5shim.googlecode.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (169 ms) relates to the external source Meaningcloud.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 670.3 kB (66%)

Content Size

1.0 MB

After Optimization

343.0 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Textalytics.com main page is 1.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 463.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 27.3 kB

  • Original 35.1 kB
  • After minification 31.2 kB
  • After compression 7.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 3.9 kB, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 27.3 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-13%

Potential reduce by 24.6 kB

  • Original 188.7 kB
  • After minification 164.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Text Alytics needs image optimization as it can save up to 24.6 kB or 13% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-68%

Potential reduce by 220.4 kB

  • Original 325.8 kB
  • After minification 316.6 kB
  • After compression 105.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 220.4 kB or 68% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 398.0 kB

  • Original 463.7 kB
  • After minification 378.1 kB
  • After compression 65.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Textalytics.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 398.0 kB or 86% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 35 (71%)

Requests Now

49

After Optimization

14

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 49 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Text Alytics. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 19 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

textalytics.com

textalytics.com

115 ms

meaningcloud.com

meaningcloud.com

169 ms

language-selector.css

language-selector.css

38 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

23 ms

blog.css

blog.css

11 ms

style.css

style.css

13 ms

header-default.css

header-default.css

34 ms

footer-v1.css

footer-v1.css

38 ms

line-icons.css

line-icons.css

36 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

38 ms

page_search.css

page_search.css

39 ms

portfolio-v1.css

portfolio-v1.css

41 ms

page_clients.css

page_clients.css

41 ms

html5.js

html5.js

48 ms

orange.css

orange.css

41 ms

custom.css

custom.css

41 ms

addtoany.min.css

addtoany.min.css

41 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

45 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

42 ms

jquery.cookie.js

jquery.cookie.js

42 ms

browser-redirect.js

browser-redirect.js

42 ms

anti-captcha-0.3.js.php

anti-captcha-0.3.js.php

109 ms

cookieconsent.min.js

cookieconsent.min.js

14 ms

index.js

index.js

41 ms

init.js

init.js

42 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

42 ms

sitepress.js

sitepress.js

46 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

44 ms

back-to-top.js

back-to-top.js

43 ms

app.js

app.js

44 ms

resize-boxes.js

resize-boxes.js

43 ms

app.css

app.css

49 ms

plugins.css

plugins.css

46 ms

ie8.css

ie8.css

48 ms

animate.css

animate.css

42 ms

box-shadows.css

box-shadows.css

41 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

103 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

76 ms

usuario.jpg

usuario.jpg

71 ms

page.js

page.js

64 ms

desarrollador_carlos.jpg

desarrollador_carlos.jpg

145 ms

logo.png

logo.png

9 ms

Home-shutterstock_114996223_long22.jpg

Home-shutterstock_114996223_long22.jpg

147 ms

map-img.png

map-img.png

11 ms

rss.png

rss.png

8 ms

facebook.png

facebook.png

10 ms

twitter.png

twitter.png

139 ms

googleplus.png

googleplus.png

139 ms

linkedin.png

linkedin.png

141 ms

youtube.png

youtube.png

141 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

141 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

24 ms

Accessibility Review

textalytics.com accessibility score

95

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

SEO Factors

textalytics.com SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Textalytics.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Textalytics.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

textalytics.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Text Alytics. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: