Tools & Wizards About Us
theapplicantmanager.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 93

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    92% of other websites

  • 82

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 54% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 75

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    32% of websites

theapplicantmanager.com

Applicant Tracking Software, Recruitment System‎ & More | TAM

Page Load Speed

3.3 sec in total

First Response

116 ms

Resources Loaded

2.1 sec

Page Rendered

1.1 sec

theapplicantmanager.com screenshot

About Website

Visit theapplicantmanager.com now to see the best up-to-date The Applicant Manager content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about theapplicantmanager.com

TAM is Applicant Tracking System Software designed for SMBs. Learn about our recruitment management system‎ and talent management software.

Visit theapplicantmanager.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Theapplicantmanager.com page load time and found that the first response time was 116 ms and then it took 3.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

theapplicantmanager.com performance score

93

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.6 s

64/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.6 s

87/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.6 s

97/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value10 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.034

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value2.7 s

97/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

theapplicantmanager.com

116 ms

theapplicantmanager.com

256 ms

animate.min.css

159 ms

tam-bs.css

223 ms

tam-bs-responsive.css

134 ms

Our browser made a total of 102 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 74% of them (75 requests) were addressed to the original Theapplicantmanager.com, 14% (14 requests) were made to Os212.infusionsoft.com and 5% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Theapplicantmanager.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.0 MB (18%)

Content Size

5.6 MB

After Optimization

4.5 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Theapplicantmanager.com main page is 5.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 4.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 33.6 kB

  • Original 42.8 kB
  • After minification 32.1 kB
  • After compression 9.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 10.7 kB, which is 25% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 33.6 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 517.0 kB

  • Original 4.9 MB
  • After minification 4.4 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, The Applicant Manager needs image optimization as it can save up to 517.0 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-66%

Potential reduce by 229.6 kB

  • Original 348.5 kB
  • After minification 338.1 kB
  • After compression 118.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 229.6 kB or 66% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 243.7 kB

  • Original 283.8 kB
  • After minification 241.3 kB
  • After compression 40.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Theapplicantmanager.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 243.7 kB or 86% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 32 (34%)

Requests Now

93

After Optimization

61

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 93 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of The Applicant Manager. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

theapplicantmanager.com

theapplicantmanager.com

116 ms

theapplicantmanager.com

theapplicantmanager.com

256 ms

animate.min.css

animate.min.css

159 ms

tam-bs.css

tam-bs.css

223 ms

tam-bs-responsive.css

tam-bs-responsive.css

134 ms

tam-style.css

tam-style.css

168 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

136 ms

magnific-popup.css

magnific-popup.css

166 ms

is-contact.css

is-contact.css

231 ms

css

css

61 ms

getTrackingCode

getTrackingCode

281 ms

cf16da5159865d01864107bb692e9b68

cf16da5159865d01864107bb692e9b68

314 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

331 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

281 ms

jquery.easing.js

jquery.easing.js

242 ms

jquery.waitforimages.js

jquery.waitforimages.js

242 ms

jquery.isotope.min.js

jquery.isotope.min.js

366 ms

jquery.prettyPhoto-3.1.4-W3C.js

jquery.prettyPhoto-3.1.4-W3C.js

364 ms

jquery.ui.totop.js

jquery.ui.totop.js

365 ms

jquery.inview.js

jquery.inview.js

409 ms

jquery.parallax-1.1.3.js

jquery.parallax-1.1.3.js

410 ms

jquery.localscroll-1.2.7-min.js

jquery.localscroll-1.2.7-min.js

473 ms

jquery.scrollTo-1.4.2-min.js

jquery.scrollTo-1.4.2-min.js

506 ms

jquery.nicescroll.min.js

jquery.nicescroll.min.js

563 ms

custom.js

custom.js

510 ms

jquery.magnific-popup.min.js

jquery.magnific-popup.min.js

538 ms

ga.js

ga.js

23 ms

538281.js

538281.js

249 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

57 ms

bg.gif

bg.gif

311 ms

topbottomlinks.png

topbottomlinks.png

354 ms

ggbridge-color-x.png

ggbridge-color-x.png

838 ms

logo.png

logo.png

402 ms

we-call-it-tam.png

we-call-it-tam.png

434 ms

tam_responsive.png

tam_responsive.png

618 ms

ggbridge-bg.png

ggbridge-bg.png

1125 ms

EdnaN.jpg

EdnaN.jpg

445 ms

JimG.jpg

JimG.jpg

532 ms

Bailey.jpg

Bailey.jpg

652 ms

h3.png

h3.png

563 ms

jr.png

jr.png

651 ms

at.png

at.png

654 ms

ag.png

ag.png

715 ms

as.png

as.png

754 ms

bu.png

bu.png

759 ms

bw.png

bw.png

758 ms

cn.png

cn.png

827 ms

cp.png

cp.png

858 ms

ce.png

ce.png

859 ms

co.png

co.png

856 ms

db.png

db.png

927 ms

el.png

el.png

935 ms

fp.png

fp.png

918 ms

Hgo13k-tfSpn0qi1SFdUfaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

Hgo13k-tfSpn0qi1SFdUfaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

37 ms

zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf

zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf

79 ms

RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

132 ms

d-6IYplOFocCacKzxwXSOKCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

d-6IYplOFocCacKzxwXSOKCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

151 ms

mnpfi9pxYH-Go5UiibESIqCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

mnpfi9pxYH-Go5UiibESIqCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

152 ms

GoodDog.otf

GoodDog.otf

957 ms

cf16da5159865d01864107bb692e9b68

cf16da5159865d01864107bb692e9b68

191 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

950 ms

fs.png

fs.png

897 ms

gw.png

gw.png

896 ms

spacer.gif

spacer.gif

87 ms

gf.png

gf.png

897 ms

gp.png

gp.png

923 ms

gu.png

gu.png

939 ms

lightbox_js.jsp

lightbox_js.jsp

300 ms

lightbox_css.jsp

lightbox_css.jsp

172 ms

anti_spam.jsp

anti_spam.jsp

190 ms

iFrameMagicServer.js

iFrameMagicServer.js

205 ms

getTrackingCode

getTrackingCode

188 ms

je.png

je.png

909 ms

nm.png

nm.png

897 ms

of.png

of.png

896 ms

og.png

og.png

891 ms

oa.png

oa.png

915 ms

r.js

r.js

117 ms

2598.js

2598.js

76 ms

pg.png

pg.png

880 ms

pc.png

pc.png

888 ms

pr.png

pr.png

872 ms

jl.png

jl.png

843 ms

sf.png

sf.png

850 ms

sw.png

sw.png

790 ms

content.js

content.js

62 ms

yahoo-dom-event.js

yahoo-dom-event.js

51 ms

lightbox.css

lightbox.css

59 ms

su.png

su.png

763 ms

se.png

se.png

715 ms

os212-39edfa15-0259-421b-ab4e-afeadf637269-v2

os212-39edfa15-0259-421b-ab4e-afeadf637269-v2

35 ms

container-min.js

container-min.js

111 ms

tm.png

tm.png

728 ms

ty.png

ty.png

729 ms

uw.png

uw.png

765 ms

spacer.gif

spacer.gif

56 ms

wc.png

wc.png

703 ms

WBE.png

WBE.png

669 ms

2016MBE_logo.png

2016MBE_logo.png

667 ms

TRUSTe-Privacy-Policy-Logo.png

TRUSTe-Privacy-Policy-Logo.png

714 ms

SafeHarbor.png

SafeHarbor.png

652 ms

__ptq.gif

__ptq.gif

18 ms

Accessibility Review

theapplicantmanager.com accessibility score

82

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

Best Practices

theapplicantmanager.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

theapplicantmanager.com SEO score

75

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't use legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Theapplicantmanager.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Theapplicantmanager.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

theapplicantmanager.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of The Applicant Manager. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: