1.7 sec in total
315 ms
878 ms
462 ms
Visit thinkingwriter.com now to see the best up-to-date Thinkingwriter content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about thinkingwriter.com
Visit thinkingwriter.comWe analyzed Thinkingwriter.com page load time and found that the first response time was 315 ms and then it took 1.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster. This domain responded with an error, which can significantly jeopardize Thinkingwriter.com rating and web reputation
thinkingwriter.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.5 s
68/100
10%
Value3.9 s
53/100
25%
Value4.3 s
76/100
10%
Value1,490 ms
14/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value9.8 s
28/100
10%
315 ms
59 ms
83 ms
96 ms
134 ms
Our browser made a total of 35 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 77% of them (27 requests) were addressed to the original Thinkingwriter.com, 9% (3 requests) were made to S.ytimg.com and 6% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (332 ms) belongs to the original domain Thinkingwriter.com.
Page size can be reduced by 465.0 kB (47%)
982.1 kB
517.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Thinkingwriter.com main page is 982.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 345.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 15.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 15.7 kB or 69% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Thinkingwriter images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 213.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 213.8 kB or 65% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 235.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Thinkingwriter.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 235.5 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 11 (35%)
31
20
The browser has sent 31 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Thinkingwriter. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
thinkingwriter.com
315 ms
style.css
59 ms
style.css
83 ms
font-awesome.min.css
96 ms
jquery.js
134 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
113 ms
html5.js
81 ms
smoothscroll.js
119 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
40 ms
background.jpg
234 ms
outer-back-search.png
122 ms
notepad-back.gif
77 ms
line.gif
78 ms
question.gif
49 ms
3927056743_e179f0ccb0_m.jpg
77 ms
follow.png
115 ms
pages-back.gif
114 ms
pages-bottom.gif
118 ms
about_box.gif
154 ms
links_box.gif
159 ms
postit-upper.gif
155 ms
postit-back.gif
230 ms
bullet.gif
231 ms
recent-posts-bottom.gif
231 ms
notepad-bottom.png
231 ms
Forum.woff
332 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
260 ms
bhSwb6XciS8
92 ms
www-embed-player-vflfNyN_r.css
27 ms
www-embed-player.js
46 ms
base.js
68 ms
fBnyGA8Aionz5086-mElmoOSPUuyQ1M9Un647_EjucU.js
40 ms
ad_status.js
71 ms
2UX7WLTfW3W8TclTUvlFyQ.woff
69 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUT8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
72 ms
thinkingwriter.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
thinkingwriter.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
thinkingwriter.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Thinkingwriter.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Thinkingwriter.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
thinkingwriter.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Thinkingwriter. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: