2.9 sec in total
228 ms
2.4 sec
263 ms
Click here to check amazing Thomaslarock content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about thomaslarock.com
This is the main page for Thomas LaRock; author, speaker, data expert, and SQLRockstar
Visit thomaslarock.comWe analyzed Thomaslarock.com page load time and found that the first response time was 228 ms and then it took 2.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
thomaslarock.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.1 s
45/100
10%
Value3.9 s
52/100
25%
Value3.4 s
90/100
10%
Value60 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.055
98/100
15%
Value4.3 s
84/100
10%
228 ms
25 ms
69 ms
41 ms
130 ms
Our browser made a total of 97 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 73% of them (71 requests) were addressed to the original Thomaslarock.com, 13% (13 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (3 requests) were made to S.gravatar.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (877 ms) belongs to the original domain Thomaslarock.com.
Page size can be reduced by 2.4 MB (36%)
6.7 MB
4.3 MB
In fact, the total size of Thomaslarock.com main page is 6.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 38.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 38.1 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 55.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Thomaslarock images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 1.1 MB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 1.1 MB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.2 MB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Thomaslarock.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.2 MB or 90% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 67 (83%)
81
14
The browser has sent 81 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Thomaslarock. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 44 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 25 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
thomaslarock.com
228 ms
css
25 ms
layerslider.css
69 ms
css
41 ms
styles.css
130 ms
events_manager.css
132 ms
email-css.css
138 ms
wp-syntax.css
134 ms
style.css
138 ms
font-awesome.min.css
135 ms
stylesheet.min.css
329 ms
webkit_stylesheet.css
197 ms
safari_stylesheet.css
205 ms
style_dynamic.css
209 ms
responsive.min.css
205 ms
style_dynamic_responsive.css
201 ms
js_composer.css
452 ms
custom_css.css
270 ms
style.css
271 ms
bundle.css
274 ms
style.css
274 ms
jetpack.css
349 ms
stats-css.css
353 ms
greensock.js
402 ms
jquery.js
497 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
392 ms
layerslider.kreaturamedia.jquery.js
497 ms
layerslider.transitions.js
420 ms
core.min.js
495 ms
widget.min.js
496 ms
position.min.js
496 ms
mouse.min.js
514 ms
sortable.min.js
516 ms
datepicker.min.js
524 ms
menu.min.js
535 ms
autocomplete.min.js
540 ms
resizable.min.js
554 ms
draggable.min.js
591 ms
devicepx-jetpack.js
62 ms
gprofiles.js
60 ms
e-201609.js
5 ms
button.min.js
581 ms
dialog.min.js
533 ms
events-manager.js
486 ms
jquery.form.min.js
491 ms
scripts.js
502 ms
email-js.js
528 ms
wpgroho.js
535 ms
qode-like.js
531 ms
plugins.js
845 ms
jquery.carouFredSel-6.2.1.js
553 ms
lemmon-slider.js
500 ms
jquery.fullPage.min.js
525 ms
jquery.mousewheel.min.js
525 ms
jquery.touchSwipe.min.js
467 ms
isotope.pkgd.min.js
502 ms
default_dynamic.js
527 ms
style.css
525 ms
default.min.js
534 ms
custom_js.js
529 ms
comment-reply.min.js
530 ms
js_composer_front.js
491 ms
wp-embed.min.js
480 ms
forms-api.min.js
500 ms
ajax-forms.min.js
428 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
427 ms
ga.js
69 ms
__utm.gif
118 ms
close_side_menu.png
91 ms
thomaslarock_logo.png
115 ms
logo_white.png
115 ms
logo_black.png
116 ms
Tom-Header-04.png
877 ms
__utm.gif
90 ms
l1cOQ90roY9yC7voEhngDCZ2oysoEQEeKwjgmXLRnTc.ttf
144 ms
soZfbn11PkChMcyPRwvf0evvDin1pK8aKteLpeZ5c0A.ttf
144 ms
dI-qzxlKVQA6TUC5RKSb3yZ2oysoEQEeKwjgmXLRnTc.ttf
145 ms
HKkPlLFNGsimw-a4gQPhqqCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
144 ms
rPYmlwqWyhpKafoxVocSUXYhjbSpvc47ee6xR_80Hnw.ttf
143 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
357 ms
HwcR1xy4rp5CQGMY8FhsNALUuEpTyoUstqEm5AMlJo4.ttf
145 ms
ZKwULyCG95tk6mOqHQfRBMDdSZkkecOE1hvV7ZHvhyU.ttf
146 ms
cbAbzEjxTdN5KKmS-gA0tcDdSZkkecOE1hvV7ZHvhyU.ttf
144 ms
rr0ijB5_2nAJsAoZ6vECXSZ2oysoEQEeKwjgmXLRnTc.ttf
178 ms
STBOO2waD2LpX45SXYjQBcDdSZkkecOE1hvV7ZHvhyU.ttf
178 ms
WmVKXVcOuffP_qmCpFuyzcDdSZkkecOE1hvV7ZHvhyU.ttf
177 ms
QoPu455RxV2raYSIFXAMBcDdSZkkecOE1hvV7ZHvhyU.ttf
177 ms
count.js
139 ms
collect
162 ms
thomaslarock.com
794 ms
hovercard.css
89 ms
services.css
90 ms
ajax-loader.gif
80 ms
Tom-Header-04.png
752 ms
logo.png
78 ms
g.gif
8 ms
8UIkryAMnYqDga6nPyU77_esZW2xOQ-xsNqO47m55DA.ttf
11 ms
thomaslarock.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
thomaslarock.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
thomaslarock.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Thomaslarock.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Thomaslarock.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
thomaslarock.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Thomaslarock. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: