Report Summary

  • 81

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    87% of other websites

  • 80

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 50% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 75

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    32% of websites

Page Load Speed

1.8 sec in total

First Response

332 ms

Resources Loaded

1.4 sec

Page Rendered

82 ms

timeedit.net screenshot

About Website

Welcome to timeedit.net homepage info - get ready to check Timeedit best content for Sweden right away, or after learning these important things about timeedit.net

Visit timeedit.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Timeedit.net page load time and found that the first response time was 332 ms and then it took 1.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

timeedit.net performance score

81

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.4 s

72/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.2 s

43/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.2 s

91/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value20 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.058

98/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.4 s

93/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

timeedit.net

332 ms

www.timeedit.net

311 ms

www.timeedit.net

453 ms

timeedit.css

107 ms

analytics.js

33 ms

Our browser made a total of 7 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 71% of them (5 requests) were addressed to the original Timeedit.net, 29% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (453 ms) belongs to the original domain Timeedit.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 4.7 kB (10%)

Content Size

46.6 kB

After Optimization

41.9 kB

In fact, the total size of Timeedit.net main page is 46.6 kB. This result falls within a vast category (top 1 000 000) of heavyweight, probably not optimized, and thus slow loading web pages. Only 5% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 21.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-59%

Potential reduce by 1.4 kB

  • Original 2.3 kB
  • After minification 2.1 kB
  • After compression 945 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 1.4 kB or 59% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 18.8 kB
  • After minification 18.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Timeedit images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 50 B

  • Original 21.0 kB
  • After minification 21.0 kB
  • After compression 20.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-73%

Potential reduce by 3.3 kB

  • Original 4.5 kB
  • After minification 3.6 kB
  • After compression 1.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Timeedit.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 3.3 kB or 73% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

4

After Optimization

4

The browser has sent 4 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Timeedit. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Accessibility Review

timeedit.net accessibility score

80

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

timeedit.net best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

timeedit.net SEO score

75

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Timeedit.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Timeedit.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Timeedit. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: