2.7 sec in total
177 ms
1.7 sec
889 ms
Welcome to tomstek.us homepage info - get ready to check Tom S Tek best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about tomstek.us
Product Reviews, Experiences, and Technical Insights from Thomas J. Hesley
Visit tomstek.usWe analyzed Tomstek.us page load time and found that the first response time was 177 ms and then it took 2.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
tomstek.us performance score
177 ms
179 ms
66 ms
27 ms
69 ms
Our browser made a total of 78 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 6% of them (5 requests) were addressed to the original Tomstek.us, 23% (18 requests) were made to Apis.google.com and 22% (17 requests) were made to Tpc.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (828 ms) relates to the external source Apis.google.com.
Page size can be reduced by 379.0 kB (42%)
906.7 kB
527.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Tomstek.us main page is 906.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 391.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 66.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 66.7 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 19.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Tom S Tek images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 145.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 145.6 kB or 62% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 147.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Tomstek.us needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 147.4 kB or 73% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 35 (49%)
71
36
The browser has sent 71 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Tom S Tek. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 29 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
tomstek.us
177 ms
autoptimize_0fa16f9ec8a50d2772821690b3018dfe.css
179 ms
css
66 ms
adsbygoogle.js
27 ms
platform.js
69 ms
devicepx-jetpack.js
23 ms
gprofiles.js
60 ms
e-201611.js
25 ms
autoptimize_e005e06fa5e3ccb0f444658f029187ab.js
358 ms
analytics.js
175 ms
HoneywellRTH9580WFSmartThermostatBootScreen_001.jpg
149 ms
HoneywellRTH9580WFSmartThermostatWiFiSetupScreen_001.jpg
149 ms
HoneywellRTH9580WFWiFiSmartThermostatHomeScreen_001.jpg
147 ms
HoneywellSmartThermostatRTH9580WFFront_001.jpg
110 ms
IMG_0265_001.jpg
109 ms
HoneywellRTH8580WFThermostatPriorToReset.jpg
108 ms
ca-pub-1501000800972210.js
209 ms
zrt_lookup.html
417 ms
show_ads_impl.js
149 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
123 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
384 ms
fastbutton
580 ms
fastbutton
578 ms
fastbutton
575 ms
fastbutton
577 ms
fastbutton
571 ms
fastbutton
569 ms
fastbutton
828 ms
fastbutton
826 ms
fastbutton
825 ms
fastbutton
822 ms
fVu1p3782bqS2z-CaJvp9hsxEYwM7FgeyaSgU71cLG0.woff
525 ms
lJAvZoKA5NttpPc9yc6lPUnwhEOjQ2CQgMjdTKA0dzI.woff
771 ms
PIbvSEyHEdL91QLOQRnZ1xa1RVmPjeKy21_GQJaLlJI.woff
802 ms
erE3KsIWUumgD1j_Ca-V-z8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
802 ms
Genericons.svg
305 ms
8AAnjaY2BgYGQAgosrjpwF0ZcUq9bCaABTzgdAAAA=
96 ms
collect
279 ms
collect
424 ms
ads
428 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
377 ms
hovercard.css
319 ms
services.css
324 ms
osd.js
149 ms
g.gif
232 ms
ads
490 ms
ads
476 ms
ads
416 ms
postmessageRelay
504 ms
ads
277 ms
rs=AGLTcCMmxxv5a__MjyaVcD74l1XyH_kiOQ
275 ms
abg.js
394 ms
ads
468 ms
m_js_controller.js
167 ms
googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png
258 ms
scream_V3_display_url_single_css.css
181 ms
scream_V3_display_url_single_css.js
165 ms
layout_engine.js
186 ms
11857857335304900304
255 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
116 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
116 ms
grlryt2bdKIyfMSOhzd1eA.woff
95 ms
3193398744-postmessagerelay.js
170 ms
rpc:shindig_random.js
142 ms
s
37 ms
x_button_blue2.png
101 ms
18347678707430214154
33 ms
fBnyGA8Aionz5086-mElmoOSPUuyQ1M9Un647_EjucU.js
22 ms
Hotel_SingleItem_ImageFill_01_468x60.html
32 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
27 ms
common_styles_v2.css
12 ms
Hotel_SingleItem_ImageFill_01_common.css
13 ms
angular.min.js
13 ms
utils_min.js
8 ms
addata.js
12 ms
layouts_bootstrap_v3.js
12 ms
common_scripts_v4.js
26 ms
Hotel_SingleItem_ImageFill_01.js
25 ms
tomstek.us SEO score
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Tomstek.us can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Tomstek.us main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
tomstek.us
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Tom S Tek. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: