15.5 sec in total
482 ms
14.8 sec
206 ms
Visit tooptions.com now to see the best up-to-date Tooptions content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about tooptions.com
Visit tooptions.comWe analyzed Tooptions.com page load time and found that the first response time was 482 ms and then it took 15 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
tooptions.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value0.6 s
100/100
10%
Value0.6 s
100/100
25%
Value1.9 s
100/100
10%
Value0 ms
100/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value0.6 s
100/100
10%
482 ms
1090 ms
464 ms
756 ms
1158 ms
Our browser made a total of 44 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 75% of them (33 requests) were addressed to the original Tooptions.com, 7% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 5% (2 requests) were made to Tooptions.postaffiliatepro.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.2 sec) relates to the external source Hm.baidu.com.
Page size can be reduced by 473.3 kB (33%)
1.4 MB
966.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Tooptions.com main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 819.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 41.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 41.5 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 15.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Tooptions images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 223.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 223.1 kB or 67% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 193.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Tooptions.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 193.1 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 7 (18%)
40
33
The browser has sent 40 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Tooptions. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
tooptions.com
482 ms
www.tooptions.com
1090 ms
www.tooptions.com
464 ms
-100268448-min-noembed-nosprites-1.css
756 ms
-457152732-min-noembed-nosprites-1.js
1158 ms
-318289040-min-noembed-nosprites-1.js
957 ms
RbuUdsW
1204 ms
smallIcon.png
481 ms
logo.png
256 ms
trSteps.gif
259 ms
infCenter.gif
510 ms
schoolImg.gif
752 ms
bb.gif
711 ms
activityImg.gif
718 ms
ajax-loader-big.gif
718 ms
partner_1.gif
714 ms
partner_2.gif
754 ms
partner_3.gif
949 ms
partner_4.gif
950 ms
partner_5.gif
957 ms
partner_6.gif
964 ms
partner_7.gif
1004 ms
partner_8.gif
1007 ms
partner_9.gif
1195 ms
partner_10.gif
1184 ms
banner_1_20160321.jpg
2478 ms
banner_2_20160321.jpg
2368 ms
banner_3_20160321.jpg
1721 ms
banner_4_20160321.jpg
1943 ms
opacityBg.png
1409 ms
smallIcon.png
1648 ms
advantageIcon.png
1633 ms
downloadIcon.png
1851 ms
trackjs.js
302 ms
hm.js
3221 ms
hm.gif
461 ms
ApiGo
1498 ms
GetCurrentTime
238 ms
analytics.js
25 ms
track.php
56 ms
tracking.js
165 ms
collect
13 ms
collect
23 ms
script_data.js
191 ms
tooptions.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't have a <title> element
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
tooptions.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
tooptions.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't have a <title> element
N/A
ZH
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Tooptions.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is Chinese. Our system also found out that Tooptions.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
tooptions.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Tooptions. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: