Tools & Wizards About Us
tooptions.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 100

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    97% of other websites

  • 71

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 37% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 58

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    20% of websites

tooptions.com

Page Load Speed

15.5 sec in total

First Response

482 ms

Resources Loaded

14.8 sec

Page Rendered

206 ms

tooptions.com screenshot

About Website

Visit tooptions.com now to see the best up-to-date Tooptions content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about tooptions.com

Visit tooptions.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Tooptions.com page load time and found that the first response time was 482 ms and then it took 15 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

tooptions.com performance score

100

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value0.6 s

100/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value0.6 s

100/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value1.9 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value0.6 s

100/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

tooptions.com

482 ms

www.tooptions.com

1090 ms

www.tooptions.com

464 ms

-100268448-min-noembed-nosprites-1.css

756 ms

-457152732-min-noembed-nosprites-1.js

1158 ms

Our browser made a total of 44 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 75% of them (33 requests) were addressed to the original Tooptions.com, 7% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 5% (2 requests) were made to Tooptions.postaffiliatepro.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.2 sec) relates to the external source Hm.baidu.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 473.3 kB (33%)

Content Size

1.4 MB

After Optimization

966.0 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Tooptions.com main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 819.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 41.5 kB

  • Original 53.7 kB
  • After minification 49.2 kB
  • After compression 12.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 41.5 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 15.6 kB

  • Original 819.6 kB
  • After minification 804.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Tooptions images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-67%

Potential reduce by 223.1 kB

  • Original 332.4 kB
  • After minification 332.3 kB
  • After compression 109.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 223.1 kB or 67% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 193.1 kB

  • Original 233.7 kB
  • After minification 233.5 kB
  • After compression 40.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Tooptions.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 193.1 kB or 83% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 7 (18%)

Requests Now

40

After Optimization

33

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 40 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Tooptions. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

tooptions.com

tooptions.com

482 ms

www.tooptions.com

www.tooptions.com

1090 ms

www.tooptions.com

www.tooptions.com

464 ms

-100268448-min-noembed-nosprites-1.css

-100268448-min-noembed-nosprites-1.css

756 ms

-457152732-min-noembed-nosprites-1.js

-457152732-min-noembed-nosprites-1.js

1158 ms

-318289040-min-noembed-nosprites-1.js

-318289040-min-noembed-nosprites-1.js

957 ms

RbuUdsW

RbuUdsW

1204 ms

smallIcon.png

smallIcon.png

481 ms

logo.png

logo.png

256 ms

trSteps.gif

trSteps.gif

259 ms

infCenter.gif

infCenter.gif

510 ms

schoolImg.gif

schoolImg.gif

752 ms

bb.gif

bb.gif

711 ms

activityImg.gif

activityImg.gif

718 ms

ajax-loader-big.gif

ajax-loader-big.gif

718 ms

partner_1.gif

partner_1.gif

714 ms

partner_2.gif

partner_2.gif

754 ms

partner_3.gif

partner_3.gif

949 ms

partner_4.gif

partner_4.gif

950 ms

partner_5.gif

partner_5.gif

957 ms

partner_6.gif

partner_6.gif

964 ms

partner_7.gif

partner_7.gif

1004 ms

partner_8.gif

partner_8.gif

1007 ms

partner_9.gif

partner_9.gif

1195 ms

partner_10.gif

partner_10.gif

1184 ms

banner_1_20160321.jpg

banner_1_20160321.jpg

2478 ms

banner_2_20160321.jpg

banner_2_20160321.jpg

2368 ms

banner_3_20160321.jpg

banner_3_20160321.jpg

1721 ms

banner_4_20160321.jpg

banner_4_20160321.jpg

1943 ms

opacityBg.png

opacityBg.png

1409 ms

smallIcon.png

smallIcon.png

1648 ms

advantageIcon.png

advantageIcon.png

1633 ms

downloadIcon.png

downloadIcon.png

1851 ms

trackjs.js

trackjs.js

302 ms

hm.js

hm.js

3221 ms

hm.gif

hm.gif

461 ms

ApiGo

ApiGo

1498 ms

GetCurrentTime

GetCurrentTime

238 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

25 ms

track.php

track.php

56 ms

tracking.js

tracking.js

165 ms

collect

collect

13 ms

collect

collect

23 ms

script_data.js

script_data.js

191 ms

Accessibility Review

tooptions.com accessibility score

71

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't have a <title> element

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

tooptions.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

tooptions.com SEO score

58

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't have a <title> element

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    ZH

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Tooptions.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is Chinese. Our system also found out that Tooptions.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

tooptions.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Tooptions. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: