5.7 sec in total
360 ms
5 sec
320 ms
Welcome to tuning-light.net homepage info - get ready to check TUNING LIGHT best content right away, or after learning these important things about tuning-light.net
Todo lo que necesitas saber sobre INDICE . Entra para más información.
Visit tuning-light.netWe analyzed Tuning-light.net page load time and found that the first response time was 360 ms and then it took 5.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
tuning-light.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.9 s
10/100
10%
Value8.8 s
1/100
25%
Value7.6 s
25/100
10%
Value490 ms
59/100
30%
Value0.012
100/100
15%
Value10.1 s
26/100
10%
360 ms
3024 ms
329 ms
224 ms
233 ms
Our browser made a total of 54 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 91% of them (49 requests) were addressed to the original Tuning-light.net, 4% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3 sec) belongs to the original domain Tuning-light.net.
Page size can be reduced by 560.9 kB (42%)
1.3 MB
783.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Tuning-light.net main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 633.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 115.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 115.3 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 19.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. TUNING LIGHT images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 266.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 266.1 kB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 159.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Tuning-light.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 159.8 kB or 87% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 22 (56%)
39
17
The browser has sent 39 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of TUNING LIGHT. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
tuning-light.net
360 ms
www.tuning-light.net
3024 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
329 ms
styles.css
224 ms
shortcode.css
233 ms
style.css
326 ms
owl.carousel.all.css
231 ms
magnific-popup.css
349 ms
animate.css
653 ms
style.css
691 ms
media.css
456 ms
css
24 ms
css
38 ms
jquery.js
664 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
466 ms
jquery.smooth-scroll.js
519 ms
jquery.bxslider.css
193 ms
jquery.form.min.js
215 ms
scripts.js
247 ms
anti-spam-4.1.js
391 ms
tweenmax.min.js
503 ms
shortcode.js
417 ms
custom-admin.js
441 ms
jquery.unveil.min.js
436 ms
owl.carousel.js
682 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.min.js
636 ms
jquery.hover-intent.min.js
560 ms
isotope.pkgd.min.js
577 ms
main.js
611 ms
wp-embed.min.js
619 ms
jquery.bxslider.js
678 ms
bxslider.setup.js
879 ms
fondo.png
829 ms
logo.jpg
550 ms
web.png
547 ms
loading1.gif
549 ms
002.jpg
674 ms
clean02.jpg
776 ms
clean03.jpg
848 ms
pixel.png
637 ms
350x300.png
691 ms
arrows.simple.png
746 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
18 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
890 ms
MonoSocialIconsFont-1.10.ttf
1226 ms
brandon_blk-webfont.woff
986 ms
ga.js
8 ms
__utm.gif
11 ms
b3309-350x300.jpg
559 ms
b3284-1-350x300.jpg
452 ms
b3297-350x300.jpg
759 ms
b3283-350x300.jpg
472 ms
b3269-350x300.jpg
583 ms
b3264-350x300.jpg
589 ms
tuning-light.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
tuning-light.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
tuning-light.net SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
ES
ES
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Tuning-light.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Spanish is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Tuning-light.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
tuning-light.net
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of TUNING LIGHT. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: