Report Summary

  • 39

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    59% of other websites

  • 93

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 82% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 98

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    92% of websites

tuning-light.net

INDICE | TUNING-LIGHT.net

Page Load Speed

5.7 sec in total

First Response

360 ms

Resources Loaded

5 sec

Page Rendered

320 ms

tuning-light.net screenshot

About Website

Welcome to tuning-light.net homepage info - get ready to check TUNING LIGHT best content right away, or after learning these important things about tuning-light.net

Todo lo que necesitas saber sobre INDICE . Entra para más información.

Visit tuning-light.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Tuning-light.net page load time and found that the first response time was 360 ms and then it took 5.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

tuning-light.net performance score

39

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.9 s

10/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.8 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.6 s

25/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value490 ms

59/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.012

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.1 s

26/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

tuning-light.net

360 ms

www.tuning-light.net

3024 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

329 ms

styles.css

224 ms

shortcode.css

233 ms

Our browser made a total of 54 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 91% of them (49 requests) were addressed to the original Tuning-light.net, 4% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3 sec) belongs to the original domain Tuning-light.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 560.9 kB (42%)

Content Size

1.3 MB

After Optimization

783.7 kB

In fact, the total size of Tuning-light.net main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 633.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 115.3 kB

  • Original 136.8 kB
  • After minification 132.9 kB
  • After compression 21.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 115.3 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 19.7 kB

  • Original 633.8 kB
  • After minification 614.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. TUNING LIGHT images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-68%

Potential reduce by 266.1 kB

  • Original 389.8 kB
  • After minification 353.6 kB
  • After compression 123.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 266.1 kB or 68% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 159.8 kB

  • Original 184.2 kB
  • After minification 149.7 kB
  • After compression 24.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Tuning-light.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 159.8 kB or 87% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 22 (56%)

Requests Now

39

After Optimization

17

The browser has sent 39 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of TUNING LIGHT. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

tuning-light.net accessibility score

93

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

tuning-light.net best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

tuning-light.net SEO score

98

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    ES

  • Language Claimed

    ES

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Tuning-light.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Spanish is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Tuning-light.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of TUNING LIGHT. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: