Tools & Wizards About Us
txtimpact.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 73

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    83% of other websites

  • 68

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 33% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    84% of websites

txtimpact.com

Mass Texting | Business Text Messaging | SMS Marketing

Page Load Speed

1 sec in total

First Response

26 ms

Resources Loaded

721 ms

Page Rendered

265 ms

txtimpact.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Txtimpact content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about txtimpact.com

Mass texting and Business Text messaging software from TXTImpact is a versatile and effective way to engage customers and drive sales. Sign up for a free trial!

Visit txtimpact.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Txtimpact.com page load time and found that the first response time was 26 ms and then it took 986 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

txtimpact.com performance score

73

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.4 s

71/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.7 s

17/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.4 s

98/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value130 ms

96/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.059

98/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.7 s

80/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

txtimpact.com

26 ms

txtimpact.com

23 ms

www.txtimpact.com

52 ms

style-13.css

11 ms

q-a-plus.css

36 ms

Our browser made a total of 76 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 88% of them (67 requests) were addressed to the original Txtimpact.com, 3% (2 requests) were made to Apis.google.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (440 ms) relates to the external source C.statcounter.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 348.3 kB (40%)

Content Size

862.7 kB

After Optimization

514.4 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Txtimpact.com main page is 862.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 418.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 30.9 kB

  • Original 39.0 kB
  • After minification 33.6 kB
  • After compression 8.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 5.4 kB, which is 14% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 30.9 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-9%

Potential reduce by 38.4 kB

  • Original 418.6 kB
  • After minification 380.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Txtimpact images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-60%

Potential reduce by 139.9 kB

  • Original 234.6 kB
  • After minification 227.4 kB
  • After compression 94.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 139.9 kB or 60% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 139.2 kB

  • Original 170.5 kB
  • After minification 156.9 kB
  • After compression 31.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Txtimpact.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 139.2 kB or 82% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 26 (41%)

Requests Now

64

After Optimization

38

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 64 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Txtimpact. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

txtimpact.com

txtimpact.com

26 ms

txtimpact.com

txtimpact.com

23 ms

www.txtimpact.com

www.txtimpact.com

52 ms

style-13.css

style-13.css

11 ms

q-a-plus.css

q-a-plus.css

36 ms

styles.css

styles.css

38 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

37 ms

mate-tabs-reload.css

mate-tabs-reload.css

43 ms

shiftnav.min.css

shiftnav.min.css

44 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

56 ms

standard-dark.css

standard-dark.css

46 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

62 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

53 ms

jquery.mate-tabs-reload.js

jquery.mate-tabs-reload.js

53 ms

mate.tabsr.custom.js

mate.tabsr.custom.js

52 ms

admin-bar.min.css

admin-bar.min.css

54 ms

css

css

98 ms

style-12.css

style-12.css

79 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

106 ms

tile-slider.js

tile-slider.js

83 ms

custom.js

custom.js

83 ms

conversion.js

conversion.js

85 ms

q-a-plus.js

q-a-plus.js

83 ms

jquery.form.min.js

jquery.form.min.js

83 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

86 ms

shiftnav.min.js

shiftnav.min.js

87 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

87 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

70 ms

t11.png

t11.png

24 ms

counter.js

counter.js

50 ms

home-hero.jpg

home-hero.jpg

18 ms

getstarted.png

getstarted.png

14 ms

sms-marketing-home.png

sms-marketing-home.png

15 ms

business-text-message-home.png

business-text-message-home.png

15 ms

picture-message-service-home.png

picture-message-service-home.png

15 ms

sms-developer-api-home.png

sms-developer-api-home.png

17 ms

sms-polling-home.png

sms-polling-home.png

19 ms

shortcodes-home.png

shortcodes-home.png

19 ms

toll-free-number-texting.png

toll-free-number-texting.png

21 ms

Virtual-number-texting.png

Virtual-number-texting.png

20 ms

Landline-texting.png

Landline-texting.png

22 ms

symantec.jpg

symantec.jpg

31 ms

intel.jpg

intel.jpg

30 ms

hiltom.jpg

hiltom.jpg

29 ms

IBM.jpg

IBM.jpg

30 ms

intuit_150x150.jpg

intuit_150x150.jpg

30 ms

sorr.jpg

sorr.jpg

29 ms

suzlon.jpg

suzlon.jpg

33 ms

American-heart-association.png

American-heart-association.png

31 ms

dc-gov.png

dc-gov.png

33 ms

prime-inc.png

prime-inc.png

34 ms

Verizon-Telematics.png

Verizon-Telematics.png

31 ms

uhaul.jpg

uhaul.jpg

32 ms

vendor-logo-exxon.jpg

vendor-logo-exxon.jpg

34 ms

washington-post.jpg

washington-post.jpg

36 ms

WSJ-150x150.jpg

WSJ-150x150.jpg

34 ms

lynn-university.png

lynn-university.png

36 ms

lincoln.png

lincoln.png

37 ms

apriva.png

apriva.png

36 ms

airtel.jpg

airtel.jpg

37 ms

facebook.png

facebook.png

37 ms

twitter.png

twitter.png

37 ms

gplus.png

gplus.png

38 ms

virtual-number-texting.png

virtual-number-texting.png

168 ms

landline-texting.png

landline-texting.png

166 ms

ibm.jpg

ibm.jpg

158 ms

american-heart-association.png

american-heart-association.png

155 ms

verizon-telematics.png

verizon-telematics.png

155 ms

wsj-150x150.jpg

wsj-150x150.jpg

150 ms

t.php

t.php

440 ms

plusone.js

plusone.js

247 ms

54 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

14 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

19 ms

28 ms

cb=gapi.loaded_0

cb=gapi.loaded_0

30 ms

Accessibility Review

txtimpact.com accessibility score

68

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best Practices

txtimpact.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

txtimpact.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Txtimpact.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Txtimpact.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

txtimpact.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Txtimpact. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: