Report Summary

  • 91

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    91% of other websites

  • 86

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 62% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    95% of websites

Page Load Speed

2.9 sec in total

First Response

226 ms

Resources Loaded

2.4 sec

Page Rendered

286 ms

typingtester.org screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Typingtester content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about typingtester.org

Write in your ENGLISH text wherever you may be with the best online virtual ENGLISH keyboards on the web. use & enjoy ...

Visit typingtester.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Typingtester.org page load time and found that the first response time was 226 ms and then it took 2.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

typingtester.org performance score

91

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.5 s

69/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.9 s

81/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.5 s

98/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value80 ms

99/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.033

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value2.9 s

96/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

typingtester.org

226 ms

www.typingtester.org

461 ms

style.css

149 ms

jquery.min.js

26 ms

application.css

208 ms

Our browser made a total of 79 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 19% of them (15 requests) were addressed to the original Typingtester.org, 13% (10 requests) were made to Static.xx.fbcdn.net and 10% (8 requests) were made to Googleads.g.doubleclick.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1 sec) relates to the external source Connect.facebook.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 353.9 kB (36%)

Content Size

988.1 kB

After Optimization

634.2 kB

In fact, the total size of Typingtester.org main page is 988.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 390.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 121.3 kB

  • Original 171.1 kB
  • After minification 168.6 kB
  • After compression 49.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 121.3 kB or 71% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 9.1 kB

  • Original 390.1 kB
  • After minification 381.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Typingtester images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-40%

Potential reduce by 121.0 kB

  • Original 305.7 kB
  • After minification 305.5 kB
  • After compression 184.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 121.0 kB or 40% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 102.5 kB

  • Original 121.2 kB
  • After minification 104.4 kB
  • After compression 18.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Typingtester.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 102.5 kB or 85% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 34 (46%)

Requests Now

74

After Optimization

40

The browser has sent 74 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Typingtester. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

typingtester.org accessibility score

86

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Best Practices

typingtester.org best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

typingtester.org SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    WINDOWS-1252

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Typingtester.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Typingtester.org main page’s claimed encoding is windows-1252. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Typingtester. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: