4.7 sec in total
263 ms
4 sec
399 ms
Click here to check amazing Ultrafine content for Germany. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about ultrafine.de
Visit ultrafine.deWe analyzed Ultrafine.de page load time and found that the first response time was 263 ms and then it took 4.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
ultrafine.de performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.9 s
51/100
10%
Value3.4 s
65/100
25%
Value4.0 s
80/100
10%
Value40 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.203
61/100
15%
Value4.0 s
88/100
10%
263 ms
17 ms
99 ms
195 ms
297 ms
Our browser made a total of 62 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 84% of them (52 requests) were addressed to the original Ultrafine.de, 11% (7 requests) were made to Anno.ultrafine.de and 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.4 sec) relates to the external source Anno.ultrafine.de.
Page size can be reduced by 365.9 kB (22%)
1.7 MB
1.3 MB
In fact, the total size of Ultrafine.de main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 21.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 21.3 kB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 23.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ultrafine images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 253.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 253.5 kB or 64% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 67.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ultrafine.de needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 67.8 kB or 81% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 38 (63%)
60
22
The browser has sent 60 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ultrafine. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 27 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
263 ms
ga.js
17 ms
widgetkit-915f9c89.css
99 ms
template.css
195 ms
mootools-core.js
297 ms
core.js
343 ms
caption.js
340 ms
jquery.js
627 ms
widgetkit-d42bec78.js
600 ms
base.css
289 ms
layout.css
385 ms
menus.css
391 ms
modules.css
442 ms
tools.css
438 ms
system.css
481 ms
extensions.css
486 ms
custom.css
537 ms
arial.css
586 ms
arial.css
575 ms
style.css
582 ms
print.css
648 ms
warp.js
672 ms
accordionmenu.js
682 ms
dropdownmenu.js
686 ms
template.js
707 ms
rechner.css
1337 ms
prodketten.css
1339 ms
toolbar.css
1340 ms
tooltip.css
1342 ms
jquery.min.js
2448 ms
timeline.js
2345 ms
region.js
1429 ms
__utm.gif
13 ms
lightbox.js
148 ms
mediaelement-and-player.js
201 ms
spotlight.js
125 ms
base.css
132 ms
layout.css
182 ms
menus.css
193 ms
modules.css
220 ms
tools.css
228 ms
system.css
251 ms
system.css
284 ms
system-all.css
309 ms
print.css
297 ms
background.jpg
767 ms
pixel.gif
59 ms
logo_en.png
671 ms
fr.gif
154 ms
ru.gif
101 ms
en.gif
99 ms
de.gif
195 ms
donate_en.png
198 ms
Seemann.png
271 ms
insel_start.jpg
489 ms
theater.png
481 ms
haengendegaerten.png
492 ms
background-head.png
363 ms
dropdown-gradient_02.jpg
461 ms
background-lay.png
559 ms
background-bottom.png
529 ms
header-gradient_02.jpg
511 ms
ultrafine.de accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
ultrafine.de best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
ultrafine.de SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ultrafine.de can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Ultrafine.de main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
ultrafine.de
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Ultrafine. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: