Tools & Wizards About Us
unitstep.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 96

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    94% of other websites

  • 79

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 48% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 77

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    36% of websites

unitstep.net

the home of peter chng » unitstep.net

Page Load Speed

2.9 sec in total

First Response

712 ms

Resources Loaded

2 sec

Page Rendered

260 ms

unitstep.net screenshot

About Website

Welcome to unitstep.net homepage info - get ready to check Unitstep best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about unitstep.net

unitstep.net: the home page of peter chng, a software developer based in ontario, canada.

Visit unitstep.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Unitstep.net page load time and found that the first response time was 712 ms and then it took 2.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

unitstep.net performance score

96

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.1 s

80/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.1 s

96/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.1 s

99/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value40 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.4 s

93/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

unitstep.net

712 ms

style.css

65 ms

lightbox.css

199 ms

prototype.lite.js

304 ms

moo.fx.js

412 ms

Our browser made a total of 63 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 38% of them (24 requests) were addressed to the original Unitstep.net, 16% (10 requests) were made to Apis.google.com and 8% (5 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (712 ms) belongs to the original domain Unitstep.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 109.0 kB (62%)

Content Size

175.5 kB

After Optimization

66.5 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Unitstep.net main page is 175.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 120.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 22.7 kB

  • Original 32.0 kB
  • After minification 29.7 kB
  • After compression 9.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 22.7 kB or 71% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 203 B

  • Original 8.1 kB
  • After minification 7.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Unitstep images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-62%

Potential reduce by 74.8 kB

  • Original 120.6 kB
  • After minification 107.1 kB
  • After compression 45.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 74.8 kB or 62% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 11.2 kB

  • Original 14.8 kB
  • After minification 10.8 kB
  • After compression 3.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Unitstep.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 11.2 kB or 76% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 44 (79%)

Requests Now

56

After Optimization

12

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 56 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Unitstep. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 31 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

unitstep.net

unitstep.net

712 ms

style.css

style.css

65 ms

lightbox.css

lightbox.css

199 ms

prototype.lite.js

prototype.lite.js

304 ms

moo.fx.js

moo.fx.js

412 ms

litebox-1.0.js

litebox-1.0.js

438 ms

styleswitcher.js

styleswitcher.js

413 ms

yahoo-min.js

yahoo-min.js

93 ms

event-min.js

event-min.js

127 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

162 ms

unitstep

unitstep

69 ms

unitstep

unitstep

115 ms

unitstep

unitstep

124 ms

show_ads.js

show_ads.js

38 ms

urchin.js

urchin.js

47 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

181 ms

e-201609.js

e-201609.js

7 ms

e-201609.js

e-201609.js

38 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

77 ms

unitstep-background.png

unitstep-background.png

49 ms

unitstep-header.png

unitstep-header.png

49 ms

me-thumbnail.jpg

me-thumbnail.jpg

48 ms

page_text.gif

page_text.gif

52 ms

folder.gif

folder.gif

40 ms

comment.gif

comment.gif

212 ms

arrow_right.gif

arrow_right.gif

212 ms

arrow_A_ver1.gif

arrow_A_ver1.gif

198 ms

ca-pub-7972009570921043.js

ca-pub-7972009570921043.js

45 ms

zrt_lookup.html

zrt_lookup.html

236 ms

show_ads_impl.js

show_ads_impl.js

189 ms

plusone.js

plusone.js

236 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

29 ms

g.gif

g.gif

16 ms

fluid.css

fluid.css

49 ms

ads

ads

318 ms

osd.js

osd.js

19 ms

cb=gapi.loaded_0

cb=gapi.loaded_0

25 ms

cb=gapi.loaded_1

cb=gapi.loaded_1

50 ms

badge

badge

112 ms

postmessageRelay

postmessageRelay

36 ms

api.js

api.js

89 ms

core:rpc:shindig.random:shindig.sha1.js

core:rpc:shindig.random:shindig.sha1.js

183 ms

2536007149-postmessagerelay.js

2536007149-postmessagerelay.js

192 ms

rs=AGLTcCMlrrSnUuJtUWsjUb_MEjnrioCipg

rs=AGLTcCMlrrSnUuJtUWsjUb_MEjnrioCipg

20 ms

rs=AGLTcCPhDrHY2vagSjsLFOxeufqSzVU3ow

rs=AGLTcCPhDrHY2vagSjsLFOxeufqSzVU3ow

26 ms

rs=AGLTcCPccOJ2ZbZVT0WX-HhZEq5tp51qtQ

rs=AGLTcCPccOJ2ZbZVT0WX-HhZEq5tp51qtQ

81 ms

pJeswbKZO4XwVR0035gpgvesZW2xOQ-xsNqO47m55DA.ttf

pJeswbKZO4XwVR0035gpgvesZW2xOQ-xsNqO47m55DA.ttf

154 ms

JcQUq3K39RZrUxrrs7pjpwLUuEpTyoUstqEm5AMlJo4.ttf

JcQUq3K39RZrUxrrs7pjpwLUuEpTyoUstqEm5AMlJo4.ttf

185 ms

IhuqmeHx65TaW6CiR2l0VALUuEpTyoUstqEm5AMlJo4.ttf

IhuqmeHx65TaW6CiR2l0VALUuEpTyoUstqEm5AMlJo4.ttf

225 ms

rs=AGLTcCPccOJ2ZbZVT0WX-HhZEq5tp51qtQ

rs=AGLTcCPccOJ2ZbZVT0WX-HhZEq5tp51qtQ

51 ms

css

css

67 ms

m_js_controller.js

m_js_controller.js

35 ms

abg.js

abg.js

39 ms

rs=AGLTcCPccOJ2ZbZVT0WX-HhZEq5tp51qtQ

rs=AGLTcCPccOJ2ZbZVT0WX-HhZEq5tp51qtQ

15 ms

x_button_blue2.png

x_button_blue2.png

30 ms

s

s

27 ms

googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png

googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png

50 ms

loading.gif

loading.gif

73 ms

closelabel.gif

closelabel.gif

56 ms

layout_content.png

layout_content.png

55 ms

ui

ui

66 ms

MdyApZkAHG2-UELdOwjNjjFZXSz-CGj4o1JtDR7aGgs.js

MdyApZkAHG2-UELdOwjNjjFZXSz-CGj4o1JtDR7aGgs.js

9 ms

cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3SZ2oysoEQEeKwjgmXLRnTc.ttf

cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3SZ2oysoEQEeKwjgmXLRnTc.ttf

49 ms

Accessibility Review

unitstep.net accessibility score

79

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

Best Practices

unitstep.net best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

unitstep.net SEO score

77

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Unitstep.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Unitstep.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

unitstep.net

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Unitstep. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: