3.2 sec in total
347 ms
2.1 sec
794 ms
Welcome to usetrace.com homepage info - get ready to check Usetrace best content for Denmark right away, or after learning these important things about usetrace.com
Web app testing system that doesn’t require coding or constant updating. Makes continuous deployment possible.
Visit usetrace.comWe analyzed Usetrace.com page load time and found that the first response time was 347 ms and then it took 2.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
usetrace.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.7 s
29/100
10%
Value17.3 s
0/100
25%
Value11.0 s
6/100
10%
Value3,950 ms
1/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value19.8 s
2/100
10%
347 ms
372 ms
90 ms
178 ms
231 ms
Our browser made a total of 83 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 72% of them (60 requests) were addressed to the original Usetrace.com, 7% (6 requests) were made to Dev.visualwebsiteoptimizer.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to S.ytimg.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (714 ms) belongs to the original domain Usetrace.com.
Page size can be reduced by 786.1 kB (60%)
1.3 MB
522.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Usetrace.com main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 490.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 29.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 6.3 kB, which is 17% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 29.7 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 63.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Usetrace needs image optimization as it can save up to 63.5 kB or 19% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 313.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 313.6 kB or 64% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 379.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Usetrace.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 379.3 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 31 (40%)
77
46
The browser has sent 77 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Usetrace. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 26 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
usetrace.com
347 ms
usetrace.com
372 ms
bootstrap.css
90 ms
theme.css
178 ms
magnific-popup.css
231 ms
font-awesome.css
246 ms
case-study.css
249 ms
modernizr.custom.js
250 ms
jquery.min.js
338 ms
bootstrap.min.js
259 ms
classie.js
306 ms
cbpAnimatedHeader.min.js
326 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
328 ms
scrollReveal.js
331 ms
purl.js
340 ms
jquery.cookie.js
381 ms
jquery.scrollTo.js
406 ms
jquery.nav.js
408 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.min.js
414 ms
jquery.hashchange.min.js
419 ms
jqBootstrapValidation.js
423 ms
responsive-nav.min.js
456 ms
custom.js
488 ms
proxima-nova-webfontkit.css
318 ms
codeship-badge-shipped-white.png
167 ms
badge_light.png
167 ms
logo.png
133 ms
sanoma.png
119 ms
avaus.png
169 ms
dealdash.png
164 ms
suomi24.png
163 ms
virtualusers2_small.png
286 ms
virtualusers1_small.png
358 ms
steps_small.png
497 ms
sc5.png
242 ms
aller.png
241 ms
orum.png
276 ms
bitbucket.png
355 ms
github.png
355 ms
jenkins.png
388 ms
codeship.png
388 ms
hipchat.png
495 ms
jira.png
496 ms
flowdock.png
495 ms
slack.png
495 ms
visualstudioonline.png
496 ms
talentum.png
498 ms
tks.png
576 ms
cv.png
603 ms
saima.png
576 ms
ifolor.png
598 ms
if.png
598 ms
bionova.png
601 ms
algeus.png
602 ms
LeadDesk_logo_alternate_blue.png
601 ms
computerweekly.png
658 ms
arcticstartup.png
658 ms
PCWorldLogo-2012_red.png
680 ms
digitalarts.png
675 ms
startup-sauna-logo-new1.png
681 ms
5PsV0Oewr3w
169 ms
1Tzplb05vVE
227 ms
proxima-nova-regular-webfont.woff
653 ms
proxima-nova-semibold-webfont.woff
714 ms
j.php
57 ms
mixpanel-2.1.min.js
46 ms
ga.js
105 ms
team.usetrace.com
532 ms
www-embed-player-vflfNyN_r.css
160 ms
www-embed-player.js
180 ms
base.js
215 ms
v.gif
60 ms
va-f9423035fc9f0fdad5f7654cfb9df14b.js
71 ms
opa-949357b71eda375b06a39eb1b86f4730.js
104 ms
126 ms
123 ms
__utm.gif
73 ms
l.gif
39 ms
Tqng9ngJVK4Gqvh3e602hP-HqlN49KFEUSDtmrOPmWo.js
40 ms
ad_status.js
46 ms
QHD8zigcbDB8aPfIoaupKOvvDin1pK8aKteLpeZ5c0A.ttf
108 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUSZ2oysoEQEeKwjgmXLRnTc.ttf
110 ms
l.gif
4 ms
usetrace.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
usetrace.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
usetrace.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
robots.txt is not valid
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Usetrace.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Usetrace.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
usetrace.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Usetrace. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: