Tools & Wizards About Us
vidleak.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 75

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    84% of other websites

  • 86

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 62% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    75% of websites

Page Load Speed

933 ms in total

First Response

148 ms

Resources Loaded

447 ms

Page Rendered

338 ms

vidleak.net screenshot

About Website

Welcome to vidleak.net homepage info - get ready to check Vidleak best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about vidleak.net

Visit vidleak.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Vidleak.net page load time and found that the first response time was 148 ms and then it took 785 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

vidleak.net performance score

75

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.8 s

27/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.2 s

44/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.0 s

80/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value100 ms

98/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.029

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.3 s

85/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

vidleak.net

148 ms

styles.css

86 ms

jquery-1.11.0.min.js

128 ms

main.js

115 ms

respond.src.js

80 ms

Our browser made a total of 19 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Vidleak.net and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (276 ms) belongs to the original domain Vidleak.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 17.4 kB (18%)

Content Size

94.3 kB

After Optimization

77.0 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Vidleak.net main page is 94.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 81.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 5.3 kB

  • Original 6.8 kB
  • After minification 4.9 kB
  • After compression 1.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 1.9 kB, which is 28% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 5.3 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-9%

Potential reduce by 7.4 kB

  • Original 81.3 kB
  • After minification 73.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Vidleak images are well optimized though.

CSS Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 4.6 kB

  • Original 6.3 kB
  • After minification 5.1 kB
  • After compression 1.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Vidleak.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 4.6 kB or 74% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

17

After Optimization

17

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 17 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Vidleak. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

vidleak.net

vidleak.net

148 ms

styles.css

styles.css

86 ms

jquery-1.11.0.min.js

jquery-1.11.0.min.js

128 ms

main.js

main.js

115 ms

respond.src.js

respond.src.js

80 ms

video.jpg

video.jpg

108 ms

up.png

up.png

104 ms

down.png

down.png

208 ms

image1.png

image1.png

182 ms

comment-icon.jpg

comment-icon.jpg

179 ms

icontwo.jpg

icontwo.jpg

181 ms

icon1.jpg

icon1.jpg

181 ms

like-small.jpg

like-small.jpg

201 ms

icon2.jpg

icon2.jpg

234 ms

icon6.jpg

icon6.jpg

243 ms

icon4.jpg

icon4.jpg

209 ms

icon5.jpg

icon5.jpg

250 ms

icon3.jpg

icon3.jpg

276 ms

opensans-regular-webfont.woff

opensans-regular-webfont.woff

185 ms

Accessibility Review

vidleak.net accessibility score

86

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Best Practices

vidleak.net best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

vidleak.net SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't use legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Vidleak.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Vidleak.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

vidleak.net

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Vidleak. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: