3.8 sec in total
183 ms
3.4 sec
242 ms
Click here to check amazing View Foo content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about viewfoo.com
Visit viewfoo.comWe analyzed Viewfoo.com page load time and found that the first response time was 183 ms and then it took 3.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
viewfoo.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.2 s
43/100
10%
Value8.0 s
2/100
25%
Value5.8 s
50/100
10%
Value550 ms
54/100
30%
Value0.107
88/100
15%
Value9.0 s
34/100
10%
183 ms
474 ms
21 ms
261 ms
252 ms
Our browser made a total of 56 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 68% of them (38 requests) were addressed to the original Viewfoo.com, 7% (4 requests) were made to S.ytimg.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Maxcdn.bootstrapcdn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Viewfoo.com.
Page size can be reduced by 4.2 MB (70%)
6.1 MB
1.8 MB
In fact, the total size of Viewfoo.com main page is 6.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 5.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 15.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 2.5 kB, which is 13% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 15.0 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 3.5 MB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, View Foo needs image optimization as it can save up to 3.5 MB or 69% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 365.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 365.2 kB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 387.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Viewfoo.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 387.2 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 21 (41%)
51
30
The browser has sent 51 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of View Foo. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
viewfoo.com
183 ms
www.viewfoo.com
474 ms
font-awesome.min.css
21 ms
font-awesome.min.css
261 ms
settings.css
252 ms
style.css
258 ms
jquery-1.11.1.min.js
597 ms
plugins.js
463 ms
jquery.themepunch.plugins.min.js
336 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
830 ms
slider-rv.js
611 ms
timezone-detect.js
466 ms
all.js
287 ms
custom.js
610 ms
css
73 ms
bootstrap.min.css
498 ms
jquery.sidr.dark.css
446 ms
hbOkPWCBRrY
87 ms
header-logo.png
562 ms
header-bg1.jpg
810 ms
header-bg.jpg
886 ms
ipad-banner.png
1644 ms
header-bg2.jpg
1089 ms
banner-ipad-img.png
1350 ms
banner-phone-img.png
1226 ms
header-bg3.jpg
1285 ms
hand.png
1860 ms
smiley.png
1449 ms
business.png
1622 ms
f1.png
1683 ms
f2.png
1757 ms
f3.png
1832 ms
f4.png
2017 ms
f5.png
2035 ms
f6.png
2090 ms
footer-logo.jpg
2068 ms
logo-icon.png
328 ms
www-embed-player-vflfNyN_r.css
27 ms
www-embed-player.js
55 ms
base.js
117 ms
Lrq7Jibxdtv2QOPyDSqncpDfQFNs3PE6SoUrUNh2GTU.js
52 ms
ad_status.js
55 ms
zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf
62 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
70 ms
counter.js
71 ms
explore-bg.jpg
1731 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
1627 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
7 ms
t.php
164 ms
player_api
52 ms
loader.gif
1578 ms
timer.png
1590 ms
www-widgetapi.js
4 ms
bullet_boxed.png
512 ms
large_left.png
413 ms
large_right.png
495 ms
viewfoo.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
viewfoo.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
viewfoo.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Viewfoo.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Viewfoo.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
viewfoo.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of View Foo. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: