4.4 sec in total
350 ms
3.7 sec
287 ms
Visit poolscores2013.webs.com now to see the best up-to-date Pool Scores 2013 Webs content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about poolscores2013.webs.com
Visit poolscores2013.webs.comWe analyzed Poolscores2013.webs.com page load time and found that the first response time was 350 ms and then it took 4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
poolscores2013.webs.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.5 s
66/100
10%
Value6.7 s
8/100
25%
Value4.2 s
77/100
10%
Value580 ms
51/100
30%
Value0.001
100/100
15%
Value6.3 s
61/100
10%
350 ms
24 ms
39 ms
75 ms
64 ms
Our browser made a total of 41 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 5% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Poolscores2013.webs.com, 39% (16 requests) were made to Static.websimages.com and 22% (9 requests) were made to Dynamic.websimages.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3 sec) belongs to the original domain Poolscores2013.webs.com.
Page size can be reduced by 203.2 kB (21%)
968.6 kB
765.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Poolscores2013.webs.com main page is 968.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 700.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 18.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 18.6 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 3.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Pool Scores 2013 Webs images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 95.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 95.5 kB or 67% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 85.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Poolscores2013.webs.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 85.6 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 25 (78%)
32
7
The browser has sent 32 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Pool Scores 2013 Webs. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
poolscores2013.webs.com
350 ms
css
24 ms
css
39 ms
modernizr-old.js
75 ms
require.js
64 ms
jquery.min.js
74 ms
bootstrap.js
74 ms
.theme.css
2984 ms
sitebase.css
61 ms
view.app.js
61 ms
css
20 ms
fixedFreebar.css
61 ms
p.js
104 ms
collector.js
80 ms
bg.png
31 ms
nfl_bullies_540.jpg
406 ms
ModuleClassLoader.js
13 ms
tooltip.css
7 ms
qaDmg_CNIuBGdKmH4z3spA.ttf
36 ms
fdSK0BiCsJzg1JgCoZQLEaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
35 ms
creativeCommons.js
21 ms
In5nPPB6p1Mco64syFRrYQ.ttf
19 ms
imfGW7soN-ntDfo1a_OKNPesZW2xOQ-xsNqO47m55DA.ttf
20 ms
hh4Od9pccylRpuf5LUPgEp0EAVxt0G0biEntp43Qt6E.ttf
19 ms
RXTgOOQ9AAtaVOHxx0IUBOlC2pU_uJZcAXPUd4HCQp8.ttf
19 ms
footer_logo_sprite.png
21 ms
ga.js
13 ms
nj47mAZe0mYUIySgfn0wpQ.ttf
9 ms
fixedFreebar.js
38 ms
translate.js
37 ms
__utm.gif
14 ms
localize.js
4 ms
locale.js
5 ms
2 ms
header_editor_view.js
6 ms
button_view.js
4 ms
title_view.js
11 ms
text_image_view.js
10 ms
5 ms
image_view.js
3 ms
text_view.js
4 ms
poolscores2013.webs.com accessibility score
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
poolscores2013.webs.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
poolscores2013.webs.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Poolscores2013.webs.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Poolscores2013.webs.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
poolscores2013.webs.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Pool Scores 2013 Webs. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: