Tools & Wizards About Us
unicodetechnologies.wordpress.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 44

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    63% of other websites

  • 75

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 42% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 69

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    28% of websites

unicodetechnologies.wordpress.com

Unicode Technologies | Best Software Testing Training Institute

Page Load Speed

2.7 sec in total

First Response

94 ms

Resources Loaded

2.3 sec

Page Rendered

295 ms

unicodetechnologies.wordpress.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Unicode Technologies Wordpress content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about unicodetechnologies.wordpress.com

Best Software Testing Training Institute

Visit unicodetechnologies.wordpress.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Unicodetechnologies.wordpress.com page load time and found that the first response time was 94 ms and then it took 2.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

unicodetechnologies.wordpress.com performance score

44

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.7 s

58/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.3 s

43/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.8 s

83/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,640 ms

11/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value15.4 s

7/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

unicodetechnologies.wordpress.com

94 ms

unicodetechnologies.wordpress.com

369 ms

536 ms

global.css

503 ms

573 ms

Our browser made a total of 36 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 6% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Unicodetechnologies.wordpress.com, 31% (11 requests) were made to S1.wp.com and 14% (5 requests) were made to S0.wp.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1 sec) relates to the external source 0.gravatar.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 421.1 kB (62%)

Content Size

678.1 kB

After Optimization

257.0 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Unicodetechnologies.wordpress.com main page is 678.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 493.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-70%

Potential reduce by 22.6 kB

  • Original 32.4 kB
  • After minification 31.9 kB
  • After compression 9.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 22.6 kB or 70% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 9 B

  • Original 108.7 kB
  • After minification 108.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Unicode Technologies Wordpress images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 367.0 kB

  • Original 493.8 kB
  • After minification 385.2 kB
  • After compression 126.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 367.0 kB or 74% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-73%

Potential reduce by 31.5 kB

  • Original 43.2 kB
  • After minification 40.8 kB
  • After compression 11.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Unicodetechnologies.wordpress.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 31.5 kB or 73% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 23 (77%)

Requests Now

30

After Optimization

7

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 30 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Unicode Technologies Wordpress. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

unicodetechnologies.wordpress.com

unicodetechnologies.wordpress.com

94 ms

unicodetechnologies.wordpress.com

unicodetechnologies.wordpress.com

369 ms

536 ms

global.css

global.css

503 ms

573 ms

style.css

style.css

503 ms

gprofiles.js

gprofiles.js

1024 ms

wpgroho.js

wpgroho.js

499 ms

500 ms

jetpack-carousel.css

jetpack-carousel.css

493 ms

tiled-gallery.css

tiled-gallery.css

515 ms

639 ms

widgets.js

widgets.js

540 ms

524 ms

725X1342.skimlinks.js

725X1342.skimlinks.js

638 ms

w.js

w.js

511 ms

merriweather.css

merriweather.css

45 ms

images

images

169 ms

search.png

search.png

64 ms

stars.png

stars.png

122 ms

transparent.png

transparent.png

64 ms

colophon-background.png

colophon-background.png

131 ms

global-print.css

global-print.css

60 ms

Noticons.svg

Noticons.svg

160 ms

BaABdRAi2AAAA

BaABdRAi2AAAA

4 ms

merriweather-bold-webfont.ttf

merriweather-bold-webfont.ttf

159 ms

merriweather-regular-webfont.ttf

merriweather-regular-webfont.ttf

411 ms

merriweather-light-webfont.ttf

merriweather-light-webfont.ttf

157 ms

px.gif

px.gif

305 ms

302 ms

hovercard.css

hovercard.css

95 ms

services.css

services.css

187 ms

px.gif

px.gif

277 ms

g.gif

g.gif

298 ms

g.gif

g.gif

349 ms

g.gif

g.gif

405 ms

Accessibility Review

unicodetechnologies.wordpress.com accessibility score

75

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

Low

No form fields have multiple labels

High

<input type="image"> elements do not have [alt] text

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

unicodetechnologies.wordpress.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

unicodetechnologies.wordpress.com SEO score

69

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Unicodetechnologies.wordpress.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Unicodetechnologies.wordpress.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

unicodetechnologies.wordpress.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Unicode Technologies Wordpress. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: