47.6 sec in total
132 ms
25.3 sec
22.2 sec
Click here to check amazing Wallpaper content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about wallpaper.com
Wallpaper* is the world’s number one global design destination, championing the best in architecture, interiors, fashion, art and contemporary lifestyle
Visit wallpaper.comWe analyzed Wallpaper.com page load time and found that the first response time was 132 ms and then it took 47.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster.
wallpaper.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.2 s
8/100
10%
Value7.3 s
4/100
25%
Value25.1 s
0/100
10%
Value32,040 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.523
15/100
15%
Value56.5 s
0/100
10%
132 ms
81 ms
905 ms
217 ms
554 ms
Our browser made a total of 31 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 23% of them (7 requests) were addressed to the original Wallpaper.com, 61% (19 requests) were made to Cdn.wallpaper.com and 6% (2 requests) were made to Secure.assets.ipcdigital.co.uk. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (20.2 sec) relates to the external source Cdn.wallpaper.com.
Page size can be reduced by 3.7 MB (47%)
7.9 MB
4.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Wallpaper.com main page is 7.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 4.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 168.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 67.9 kB, which is 35% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 168.6 kB or 87% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 869.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Wallpaper needs image optimization as it can save up to 869.9 kB or 22% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 1.9 MB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 1.9 MB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 757.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Wallpaper.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 757.9 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 6 (25%)
24
18
The browser has sent 24 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Wallpaper. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
wallpaper.com
132 ms
www.wallpaper.com
81 ms
www.wallpaper.com
905 ms
main.css
217 ms
homepage.css
554 ms
base.js
2193 ms
home-page.js
1826 ms
ipccore.1.12.8.min.js
15028 ms
utils-min.js
14962 ms
dimore_studio_gallery_0004_room_02.jpg
14963 ms
img-placeholder-large.png
15131 ms
1432121177-RD_Banners_Desktop.jpg
20207 ms
1432109263-RD_banner_mobile_01.jpg
14930 ms
utag.js
14478 ms
social-sprite-tricolor.png
13926 ms
1394711130-prev-carousel.png
13926 ms
1394711130-next-carousel.png
13810 ms
1402063239-Wallpaper_Gallery-sprite.png
13773 ms
030816-social-sprite-black.png
13949 ms
Portrait%20Text%20Web-Regular%202.woff
9112 ms
Darby%20Sans%20Text%20Web-Regular.woff
8853 ms
Darby%20Sans%20Text%20Web-Semibold.woff
9113 ms
Portrait%20Web-Bold.woff
13947 ms
wallpaper_covers_thumbnail_ipad_222.png
1118 ms
WAST15SEM057_BLK_1.png
1119 ms
wallpaper_covers_thumbnail_print-222.gif
1119 ms
rolls-royce-phantom-p.jpg
1375 ms
f_untitled-1_gall.jpg
1376 ms
folkestone-triennial-2017-09.jpg
1376 ms
platform.js
6426 ms
utag.1169.js
5277 ms
wallpaper.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
button, link, and menuitem elements do not have accessible names.
[aria-*] attributes do not have valid values
ARIA IDs are not unique
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
wallpaper.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
wallpaper.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Wallpaper.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Wallpaper.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
wallpaper.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Wallpaper. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: