4.2 sec in total
349 ms
3.7 sec
196 ms
Visit watermarkgroup.eu now to see the best up-to-date Watermarkgroup content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about watermarkgroup.eu
Visit watermarkgroup.euWe analyzed Watermarkgroup.eu page load time and found that the first response time was 349 ms and then it took 3.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
watermarkgroup.eu performance score
349 ms
1186 ms
93 ms
120 ms
119 ms
Our browser made a total of 92 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Watermarkgroup.eu, 99% (91 requests) were made to Watermark.co.th. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) relates to the external source Watermark.co.th.
Page size can be reduced by 917.0 kB (24%)
3.8 MB
2.8 MB
In fact, the total size of Watermarkgroup.eu main page is 3.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 124 B
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 124 B or 45% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 87.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Watermarkgroup images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 322.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 322.3 kB or 73% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 507.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Watermarkgroup.eu needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 507.2 kB or 89% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 45 (49%)
91
46
The browser has sent 91 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Watermarkgroup. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 28 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 19 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
watermarkgroup.eu
349 ms
www.watermark.co.th
1186 ms
style.css
93 ms
styles.css
120 ms
fancybox.css
119 ms
bwg_frontend.css
120 ms
sumoselect.css
129 ms
font-awesome.css
125 ms
jquery.mCustomScrollbar.css
144 ms
shortcodes.css
155 ms
shortcodes_responsive.css
165 ms
flexslider.css
175 ms
easygalleryslider.css
186 ms
frontend-builder-plugin-style.css
287 ms
magnific_popup.css
208 ms
jquery.js
311 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
219 ms
jquery.fancybox.js
224 ms
bwg_frontend.js
263 ms
jquery.sumoselect.min.js
257 ms
jquery.mobile.js
280 ms
jquery.mCustomScrollbar.concat.min.js
279 ms
jquery.fullscreen-0.4.1.js
296 ms
bwg_gallery_box.js
329 ms
jquery.flexslider-min.js
345 ms
trigger_buttons.min.css
334 ms
jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.min.css
335 ms
font-awesome.min.css
358 ms
nextgen_basic_thumbnails.min.css
408 ms
style.min.css
361 ms
nggallery.css
405 ms
comment-reply.min.js
393 ms
frontend-builder-global-functions.js
401 ms
jquery.form.min.js
418 ms
scripts.js
425 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
445 ms
waypoints.min.js
451 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.js
438 ms
jquery.mobile.custom.min.js
358 ms
frontend-builder-scripts.js
394 ms
wp-embed.min.js
378 ms
ajax.min.js
391 ms
common.min.js
398 ms
nextgen_basic_thumbnails.min.js
425 ms
lightbox_context.min.js
400 ms
jquery.easing-1.3.pack.js
397 ms
jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.pack.js
403 ms
nextgen_fancybox_init.min.js
395 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
404 ms
logo-watermark-group.png
296 ms
timthumb.php
480 ms
timthumb.php
547 ms
timthumb.php
824 ms
timthumb.php
481 ms
timthumb.php
547 ms
timthumb.php
544 ms
timthumb.php
872 ms
timthumb.php
649 ms
timthumb.php
962 ms
timthumb.php
906 ms
timthumb.php
954 ms
timthumb.php
816 ms
timthumb.php
1161 ms
timthumb.php
1207 ms
timthumb.php
1230 ms
timthumb.php
1269 ms
timthumb.php
1290 ms
timthumb.php
1378 ms
timthumb.php
1448 ms
timthumb.php
1505 ms
timthumb.php
1640 ms
timthumb.php
1458 ms
timthumb.php
1457 ms
bkg_li.png
1397 ms
bkg_custombox.png
1435 ms
watermark-icon.png
1424 ms
thumbs_B3A2361.jpg
1477 ms
thumbs_B3A4523.jpg
1457 ms
thumbs_B3A3620.jpg
1452 ms
thumbs_IMG_9072.jpg
1437 ms
thumbs_B3A2716.jpg
1442 ms
thumbs_B3A2847.jpg
1472 ms
thumbs_B3A2880.jpg
1466 ms
thumbs_B3A3899.jpg
1443 ms
thumbs_IMG_9142.jpg
1384 ms
thumbs_B3A4547.jpg
1392 ms
thumbs_YA0I1075.jpg
1238 ms
facebook.png
1260 ms
twitter.png
1179 ms
picasa.png
1194 ms
youtube.png
1196 ms
bg_direction_nav.png
48 ms
watermarkgroup.eu SEO score
N/A
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Watermarkgroup.eu can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Watermarkgroup.eu main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
watermarkgroup.eu
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Watermarkgroup. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: