Tools & Wizards About Us
webhostingproposal.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

webhostingproposal.com

WebHostingProposal.com Top 10 web hosts, Cheap web Hosting, Web Hosting Reviews

Page Load Speed

7 sec in total

First Response

1.4 sec

Resources Loaded

5.1 sec

Page Rendered

538 ms

webhostingproposal.com screenshot

About Website

Visit webhostingproposal.com now to see the best up-to-date Web Hosting Proposal content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about webhostingproposal.com

WebHostingProposal.com, Top 10 web hosts, Cheap Web Hosting, Web Hosting Reviews, Web Hosting Comparison

Visit webhostingproposal.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Webhostingproposal.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.4 sec and then it took 5.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

webhostingproposal.com performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

www.webhostingproposal.com

1389 ms

style.css

283 ms

wp-customer-reviews.css

242 ms

jquery.bxslider.css

241 ms

testimonials-widget.css

241 ms

Our browser made a total of 105 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 67% of them (70 requests) were addressed to the original Webhostingproposal.com, 8% (8 requests) were made to Apis.google.com and 5% (5 requests) were made to S7.addthis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Webhostingproposal.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.0 MB (59%)

Content Size

1.7 MB

After Optimization

706.1 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Webhostingproposal.com main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 100.6 kB

  • Original 133.1 kB
  • After minification 131.8 kB
  • After compression 32.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 100.6 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-19%

Potential reduce by 62.0 kB

  • Original 321.8 kB
  • After minification 259.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Web Hosting Proposal needs image optimization as it can save up to 62.0 kB or 19% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-64%

Potential reduce by 712.1 kB

  • Original 1.1 MB
  • After minification 1.1 MB
  • After compression 393.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 712.1 kB or 64% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 153.2 kB

  • Original 173.7 kB
  • After minification 160.9 kB
  • After compression 20.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Webhostingproposal.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 153.2 kB or 88% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 52 (51%)

Requests Now

102

After Optimization

50

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 102 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Web Hosting Proposal. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 37 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.webhostingproposal.com

www.webhostingproposal.com

1389 ms

style.css

style.css

283 ms

wp-customer-reviews.css

wp-customer-reviews.css

242 ms

jquery.bxslider.css

jquery.bxslider.css

241 ms

testimonials-widget.css

testimonials-widget.css

241 ms

wp-ui.css

wp-ui.css

364 ms

wpui-light.css

wpui-light.css

289 ms

css.php

css.php

931 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

638 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

382 ms

wp-customer-reviews.js

wp-customer-reviews.js

359 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

374 ms

widget.min.js

widget.min.js

431 ms

tabs.min.js

tabs.min.js

436 ms

accordion.min.js

accordion.min.js

451 ms

mouse.min.js

mouse.min.js

453 ms

resizable.min.js

resizable.min.js

571 ms

draggable.min.js

draggable.min.js

577 ms

button.min.js

button.min.js

530 ms

position.min.js

position.min.js

528 ms

dialog.min.js

dialog.min.js

672 ms

sortable.min.js

sortable.min.js

609 ms

www.webhostingproposal.com

www.webhostingproposal.com

1230 ms

wp-ui.js

wp-ui.js

718 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

686 ms

addthis_widget.js

addthis_widget.js

11 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

542 ms

jquery.bxslider.min.js

jquery.bxslider.min.js

531 ms

ga.js

ga.js

78 ms

bg.jpg

bg.jpg

380 ms

whp-logo111.png

whp-logo111.png

380 ms

worl-wide-host-review.png

worl-wide-host-review.png

380 ms

ipagesharedhostoftheday.gif

ipagesharedhostoftheday.gif

381 ms

top10-1.png

top10-1.png

129 ms

top10-ca.png

top10-ca.png

129 ms

top10-au.png

top10-au.png

377 ms

top10-uk.png

top10-uk.png

376 ms

top10-eu.png

top10-eu.png

381 ms

top10russianwebhostlistbtn.png

top10russianwebhostlistbtn.png

381 ms

top10drupalwebhostsbtn.png

top10drupalwebhostsbtn.png

381 ms

top10joomlawebhostsbtn.png

top10joomlawebhostsbtn.png

382 ms

top10wordpresshostsbtn.png

top10wordpresshostsbtn.png

383 ms

topvpshostofthedayright.gif

topvpshostofthedayright.gif

382 ms

A2hostingdedicatedhostofthe.gif

A2hostingdedicatedhostofthe.gif

384 ms

topsharedlunarpageshosting.gif

topsharedlunarpageshosting.gif

475 ms

fb.jpg

fb.jpg

382 ms

twitter.jpg

twitter.jpg

383 ms

featured_d11.png

featured_d11.png

1219 ms

dailyhostingupdate.gif

dailyhostingupdate.gif

393 ms

no1webhost.png

no1webhost.png

549 ms

ipagehosting.png

ipagehosting.png

445 ms

hostreliability.png

hostreliability.png

471 ms

whprelrat5.png

whprelrat5.png

548 ms

serverspeed.png

serverspeed.png

548 ms

whpspdrat5.png

whpspdrat5.png

561 ms

hostfeatures.png

hostfeatures.png

561 ms

f4.5.png

f4.5.png

560 ms

webhostinghubhosting.gif

webhostinghubhosting.gif

566 ms

f5.png

f5.png

567 ms

white-2.png

white-2.png

628 ms

greengeeks.jpg

greengeeks.jpg

625 ms

fatcowwebhosting.png

fatcowwebhosting.png

629 ms

bluehostreviews.jpg

bluehostreviews.jpg

676 ms

hostpapahosting.jpg

hostpapahosting.jpg

807 ms

justhosthosting.png

justhosthosting.png

649 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

250 ms

arvixe-hosting.jpg

arvixe-hosting.jpg

590 ms

300lo.json

300lo.json

45 ms

all.js&version=v2.0

all.js&version=v2.0

685 ms

widgets.js

widgets.js

116 ms

plusone.js

plusone.js

86 ms

counter.5524cceca805eb4b9b2b.js

counter.5524cceca805eb4b9b2b.js

21 ms

inmotionhosting.png

inmotionhosting.png

346 ms

f4.png

f4.png

378 ms

theme_forest_300x2501.jpg

theme_forest_300x2501.jpg

482 ms

dailymanualtopwebhostingdate.png

dailymanualtopwebhostingdate.png

568 ms

bx_loader.gif

bx_loader.gif

435 ms

controls.png

controls.png

453 ms

sh.8e5f85691f9aaa082472a194.html

sh.8e5f85691f9aaa082472a194.html

87 ms

linkedin.html

linkedin.html

12 ms

shares.json

shares.json

55 ms

addthis_widget.js

addthis_widget.js

8 ms

cb=gapi.loaded_0

cb=gapi.loaded_0

82 ms

cb=gapi.loaded_1

cb=gapi.loaded_1

103 ms

fastbutton

fastbutton

168 ms

button.0308b81ff1714e446f674b5b9793f2cd.js

button.0308b81ff1714e446f674b5b9793f2cd.js

179 ms

share

share

105 ms

sprite_connect_v12.png

sprite_connect_v12.png

132 ms

postmessageRelay

postmessageRelay

131 ms

cb=gapi.loaded_0

cb=gapi.loaded_0

18 ms

cb=gapi.loaded_1

cb=gapi.loaded_1

44 ms

W5F8_SL0XFawnjxHGsZjJA.ttf

W5F8_SL0XFawnjxHGsZjJA.ttf

42 ms

sprite_connect_v12.png

sprite_connect_v12.png

13 ms

3193398744-postmessagerelay.js

3193398744-postmessagerelay.js

86 ms

rpc:shindig_random.js

rpc:shindig_random.js

34 ms

tweet_button.b9740740e0bcf9b0657c5b11bd4388da.en.html

tweet_button.b9740740e0bcf9b0657c5b11bd4388da.en.html

52 ms

cb=gapi.loaded_0

cb=gapi.loaded_0

5 ms

jot

jot

78 ms

23 ms

xd_arbiter.php

xd_arbiter.php

213 ms

xd_arbiter.php

xd_arbiter.php

420 ms

ping

ping

14 ms

like.php

like.php

85 ms

qeKvIRsJabD.js

qeKvIRsJabD.js

491 ms

LVx-xkvaJ0b.png

LVx-xkvaJ0b.png

553 ms

SEO Factors

webhostingproposal.com SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Webhostingproposal.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Webhostingproposal.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

webhostingproposal.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Web Hosting Proposal. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: