Report Summary

  • 100

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    97% of other websites

  • 52

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 21% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 62

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    22% of websites

webtalk.im

Forum directory

Page Load Speed

2.4 sec in total

First Response

799 ms

Resources Loaded

1.3 sec

Page Rendered

262 ms

webtalk.im screenshot

About Website

Visit webtalk.im now to see the best up-to-date Webtalk content for Russia and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about webtalk.im

Visit webtalk.im

Key Findings

We analyzed Webtalk.im page load time and found that the first response time was 799 ms and then it took 1.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

webtalk.im performance score

100

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value0.8 s

100/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value0.9 s

100/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value1.5 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.031

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value0.8 s

100/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

webtalk.im

799 ms

style.css

399 ms

http%3A%2F%2Fslitherin.potterforum.ru%2F

117 ms

http%3A%2F%2Falbedo.fludilka.su%2F

167 ms

http%3A%2F%2Fcnc.userforum.ru%2F

172 ms

Our browser made a total of 25 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 12% of them (3 requests) were addressed to the original Webtalk.im, 80% (20 requests) were made to S.wordpress.com and 8% (2 requests) were made to Counter.yadro.ru. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (799 ms) belongs to the original domain Webtalk.im.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 30.2 kB (24%)

Content Size

124.9 kB

After Optimization

94.7 kB

In fact, the total size of Webtalk.im main page is 124.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 101.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 17.7 kB

  • Original 21.6 kB
  • After minification 20.9 kB
  • After compression 3.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 17.7 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 11.1 kB

  • Original 101.4 kB
  • After minification 90.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Webtalk needs image optimization as it can save up to 11.1 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

CSS Optimization

-69%

Potential reduce by 1.4 kB

  • Original 1.9 kB
  • After minification 1.5 kB
  • After compression 597 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Webtalk.im needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.4 kB or 69% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

23

After Optimization

23

The browser has sent 23 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Webtalk. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Accessibility Review

webtalk.im accessibility score

52

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

webtalk.im best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

SEO Factors

webtalk.im SEO score

62

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    RU

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Webtalk.im can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed Russian language. Our system also found out that Webtalk.im main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Webtalk. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: