1.8 sec in total
5 ms
1.5 sec
295 ms
Welcome to weddingcards.com homepage info - get ready to check WEDDINGCARDS best content right away, or after learning these important things about weddingcards.com
MarkUpgrade: We help visionary entrepreneurs secure extraordinary domain names to power their brands to success.
Visit weddingcards.comWe analyzed Weddingcards.com page load time and found that the first response time was 5 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
weddingcards.com performance score
5 ms
478 ms
16 ms
124 ms
41 ms
Our browser made a total of 76 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Weddingcards.com, 7% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 7% (5 requests) were made to Gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (578 ms) relates to the external source Enaming.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.0 MB (65%)
1.6 MB
551.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Weddingcards.com main page is 1.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 897.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 63.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 63.4 kB or 73% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 42.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, WEDDINGCARDS needs image optimization as it can save up to 42.0 kB or 21% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 589.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 589.1 kB or 66% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 350.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Weddingcards.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 350.7 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 50 (75%)
67
17
The browser has sent 67 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of WEDDINGCARDS. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 26 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 26 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
5 ms
478 ms
style.css
16 ms
jquery.min.js
124 ms
style.css
41 ms
style-ribbons.css
43 ms
ParaAdmin.css
59 ms
style.css
73 ms
cache.skin.css
77 ms
mp-stacks-style.css
72 ms
lightbox.css
57 ms
styles.css
70 ms
bootstrap.min.css
79 ms
styles.css
75 ms
jquery.accordion.css
76 ms
tmm_custom_style.min.css
76 ms
css
193 ms
icomoon.css
77 ms
font-awesome.css
79 ms
font-awesome.min.css
78 ms
default.min.css
78 ms
jquery.js
88 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
79 ms
scripts.js
79 ms
jquery.tablednd.js
83 ms
jquery.dragtable.js
82 ms
jscolor.js
86 ms
ParaAdmin.js
92 ms
scripts.js
92 ms
jquery.accordion.js
91 ms
easy-columns.css
100 ms
frontend.css
98 ms
frontend.js
99 ms
addthis_widget.js
97 ms
output.css
102 ms
jquery.form.min.js
102 ms
elementQuery.min.js
102 ms
lightbox.js
104 ms
mp-stacks-front-end.js
103 ms
scripts.js
102 ms
api.js
183 ms
reset.css
103 ms
wp.css
102 ms
post-content.css
79 ms
menu_functions.js
78 ms
wp-embed.min.js
63 ms
functions.js
62 ms
ga.js
216 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
197 ms
analytics.js
433 ms
logo-enaming.png
111 ms
image-page-header.jpg
114 ms
578 ms
8fd0aa836412853f9fd25e4cd662b1b4.jpg
111 ms
sprite.png
112 ms
_dCzxpXzIS3sL-gdJWAP8A.ttf
391 ms
LAQwev4hdCtYkOYX4Oc7nPesZW2xOQ-xsNqO47m55DA.ttf
446 ms
UDfD6oxBaBnmFJwQ7XAFNw.ttf
503 ms
__utm.gif
221 ms
recaptcha__en.js
330 ms
300lo.json
226 ms
ajax-loader.gif
58 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
82 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
113 ms
icomoon.svg
171 ms
sh.8e5f85691f9aaa082472a194.html
79 ms
collect
118 ms
fallback
77 ms
fallback__ltr.css
3 ms
payload
14 ms
css
15 ms
logo_48.png
6 ms
refresh.png
3 ms
audio.png
11 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
8 ms
zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf
10 ms
weddingcards.com SEO score
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Weddingcards.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Weddingcards.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
weddingcards.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of WEDDINGCARDS. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: