30 sec in total
5.7 sec
24 sec
315 ms
Welcome to whoisbucket.com homepage info - get ready to check Whoisbucket best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about whoisbucket.com
whois bucket is a tool for performing who is lookups and additional domain information
Visit whoisbucket.comWe analyzed Whoisbucket.com page load time and found that the first response time was 5.7 sec and then it took 24.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster.
whoisbucket.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.0 s
23/100
10%
Value4.5 s
37/100
25%
Value6.6 s
37/100
10%
Value11,500 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.095
91/100
15%
Value16.4 s
5/100
10%
5747 ms
82 ms
4671 ms
5690 ms
162 ms
Our browser made a total of 94 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 29% of them (27 requests) were addressed to the original Whoisbucket.com, 47% (44 requests) were made to Google.com and 6% (6 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (12.1 sec) relates to the external source Google.com.
Page size can be reduced by 844.1 kB (68%)
1.2 MB
403.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Whoisbucket.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 789.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 89.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 29.1 kB, which is 26% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 89.8 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 14.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Whoisbucket needs image optimization as it can save up to 14.4 kB or 19% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 515.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 515.7 kB or 65% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 224.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Whoisbucket.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 224.2 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 79 (90%)
88
9
The browser has sent 88 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Whoisbucket. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
whoisbucket.com
5747 ms
font-awesome.min.css
82 ms
bootstrap.min.css
4671 ms
uniform.default.css
5690 ms
style-conquer.css
162 ms
style.css
5758 ms
style-responsive.css
5140 ms
plugins.css
6072 ms
light.css
247 ms
custom.css
343 ms
jqvmap.css
424 ms
show_ads.js
41 ms
jquery-1.10.2.min.js
619 ms
jquery-migrate-1.2.1.min.js
700 ms
bootstrap.min.js
782 ms
twitter-bootstrap-hover-dropdown.min.js
862 ms
jquery.slimscroll.min.js
942 ms
jquery.blockui.min.js
1023 ms
jquery.cokie.min.js
1102 ms
jquery.uniform.min.js
1184 ms
app.js
1266 ms
addthis_widget.js
77 ms
menu-toggler.png
1344 ms
font.css
83 ms
favicons
1970 ms
favicons
2797 ms
favicons
3718 ms
favicons
4138 ms
favicons
4196 ms
favicons
4051 ms
favicons
12142 ms
favicons
2910 ms
favicons
3027 ms
favicons
6162 ms
favicons
3822 ms
favicons
7443 ms
favicons
4191 ms
favicons
4258 ms
favicons
4309 ms
favicons
7433 ms
favicons
4368 ms
favicons
4515 ms
favicons
4477 ms
favicons
4600 ms
favicons
4636 ms
favicons
4709 ms
favicons
4858 ms
favicons
4822 ms
favicons
4928 ms
favicons
4989 ms
favicons
5038 ms
favicons
5102 ms
favicons
5149 ms
favicons
5217 ms
favicons
5256 ms
favicons
5332 ms
favicons
5425 ms
favicons
5447 ms
favicons
5540 ms
favicons
6607 ms
ca-pub-3744029866517417.js
184 ms
zrt_lookup.html
189 ms
show_ads_impl.js
267 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzHhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
175 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSnhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
194 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3T8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
191 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTXhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
194 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
332 ms
ga.js
144 ms
300lo.json
48 ms
533.a1f6400726ddff092ad4.js
35 ms
counter.270bdfcf33bafb0fc8fc.js
17 ms
sh.953eb77977227bfd253ee158.html
82 ms
shares.json
152 ms
ads
347 ms
__utm.gif
36 ms
osd.js
32 ms
m_js_controller.js
37 ms
abg.js
51 ms
favicon
36 ms
googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png
37 ms
nessie_icon_tiamat_white.png
29 ms
s
16 ms
x_button_blue2.png
6 ms
j6SDDiQit5YY48GNgPpnCluJgoNCzbKlh5o6eVjReZI.js
4 ms
activeview
16 ms
favicons
3727 ms
favicons
3003 ms
favicons
4766 ms
favicons
3248 ms
favicons
2671 ms
favicons
2687 ms
favicons
6236 ms
favicons
3150 ms
whoisbucket.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
whoisbucket.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
whoisbucket.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Whoisbucket.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Whoisbucket.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
whoisbucket.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Whoisbucket. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: