1.6 sec in total
176 ms
583 ms
882 ms
Click here to check amazing Whosbacon content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about whosbacon.com
Visit whosbacon.comWe analyzed Whosbacon.com page load time and found that the first response time was 176 ms and then it took 1.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.
whosbacon.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.0 s
51/100
10%
Value14.6 s
0/100
25%
Value4.6 s
71/100
10%
Value260 ms
83/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value11.6 s
18/100
10%
176 ms
106 ms
30 ms
71 ms
86 ms
Our browser made a total of 19 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 68% of them (13 requests) were addressed to the original Whosbacon.com, 16% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 11% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (271 ms) belongs to the original domain Whosbacon.com.
Page size can be reduced by 490.5 kB (10%)
5.0 MB
4.5 MB
In fact, the total size of Whosbacon.com main page is 5.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 4.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 9.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 4.7 kB, which is 39% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 9.9 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 327.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Whosbacon images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 32.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 32.0 kB or 60% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 120.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Whosbacon.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 120.9 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 3 (23%)
13
10
The browser has sent 13 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Whosbacon. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
whosbacon.com
176 ms
www.whosbacon.com
106 ms
bootstrap.min.css
30 ms
landing-page.css
71 ms
font-awesome.min.css
86 ms
css
22 ms
jquery.js
47 ms
bootstrap.min.js
70 ms
tech.jpg
197 ms
art.jpg
271 ms
startup.jpg
195 ms
analytics.js
6 ms
intro-bg.jpg
167 ms
banner-bg.jpg
71 ms
collect
16 ms
DvlFBScY1r-FMtZSYIYoYw.ttf
18 ms
v0SdcGFAl2aezM9Vq_aFTQ.ttf
22 ms
nj47mAZe0mYUIySgfn0wpQ.ttf
26 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
66 ms
whosbacon.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
whosbacon.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
whosbacon.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Whosbacon.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Whosbacon.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
whosbacon.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Whosbacon. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: