Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

wildlifetracking.org

Wildlife Tracking

Page Load Speed

6.9 sec in total

First Response

1.8 sec

Resources Loaded

4.9 sec

Page Rendered

163 ms

wildlifetracking.org screenshot

About Website

Visit wildlifetracking.org now to see the best up-to-date Wildlife Tracking content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about wildlifetracking.org

Visit wildlifetracking.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Wildlifetracking.org page load time and found that the first response time was 1.8 sec and then it took 5.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

wildlifetracking.org performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

wildlifetracking.org

1783 ms

fadeshow.js

126 ms

ddlevelsmenu.js

132 ms

site.css

91 ms

ddlevelsmenu-base.css

210 ms

Our browser made a total of 35 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 63% of them (22 requests) were addressed to the original Wildlifetracking.org, 11% (4 requests) were made to Seaturtle.org and 6% (2 requests) were made to Facebook.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Wildlifetracking.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 65.2 kB (25%)

Content Size

259.6 kB

After Optimization

194.4 kB

In fact, the total size of Wildlifetracking.org main page is 259.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 176.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 18.6 kB

  • Original 24.9 kB
  • After minification 24.6 kB
  • After compression 6.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 18.6 kB or 75% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 6.4 kB

  • Original 176.7 kB
  • After minification 170.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Wildlife Tracking images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-69%

Potential reduce by 36.8 kB

  • Original 53.0 kB
  • After minification 46.1 kB
  • After compression 16.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 36.8 kB or 69% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-69%

Potential reduce by 3.3 kB

  • Original 4.9 kB
  • After minification 3.4 kB
  • After compression 1.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Wildlifetracking.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 3.3 kB or 69% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 12 (35%)

Requests Now

34

After Optimization

22

The browser has sent 34 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Wildlife Tracking. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

SEO Factors

wildlifetracking.org SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Wildlifetracking.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Wildlifetracking.org main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Wildlife Tracking. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: