Report Summary

  • 78

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    85% of other websites

  • 86

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 62% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 75

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    32% of websites

Page Load Speed

2 sec in total

First Response

168 ms

Resources Loaded

1.7 sec

Page Rendered

122 ms

williamjoseph.net screenshot

About Website

Visit williamjoseph.net now to see the best up-to-date Williamjoseph content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about williamjoseph.net

William Joseph fishing get all the fishing equipment and fishing gear you need. Buy all our packs directly from the site today.

Visit williamjoseph.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Williamjoseph.net page load time and found that the first response time was 168 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

williamjoseph.net performance score

78

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.1 s

45/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.6 s

60/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.1 s

92/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value200 ms

90/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.099

90/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.9 s

89/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

williamjoseph.net

168 ms

www.williamjoseph.net

182 ms

screen.css

118 ms

navigation.css

115 ms

new-gear-page.css

119 ms

Our browser made a total of 40 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 90% of them (36 requests) were addressed to the original Williamjoseph.net, 5% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Feeds.feedburner.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1 sec) belongs to the original domain Williamjoseph.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 124.7 kB (12%)

Content Size

1.0 MB

After Optimization

911.8 kB

In fact, the total size of Williamjoseph.net main page is 1.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 850.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 10.9 kB

  • Original 13.7 kB
  • After minification 9.9 kB
  • After compression 2.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 3.8 kB, which is 28% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 10.9 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 6.3 kB

  • Original 850.2 kB
  • After minification 844.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Williamjoseph images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-57%

Potential reduce by 73.1 kB

  • Original 129.0 kB
  • After minification 127.6 kB
  • After compression 55.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 73.1 kB or 57% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 34.5 kB

  • Original 43.7 kB
  • After minification 34.8 kB
  • After compression 9.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Williamjoseph.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 34.5 kB or 79% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 8 (21%)

Requests Now

38

After Optimization

30

The browser has sent 38 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Williamjoseph. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

williamjoseph.net accessibility score

86

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't have a <title> element

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Best Practices

williamjoseph.net best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

williamjoseph.net SEO score

75

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't have a <title> element

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Williamjoseph.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Williamjoseph.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Williamjoseph. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: