Report Summary

  • 61

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    76% of other websites

  • 92

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 80% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    95% of websites

windowcleaning.com

Window Cleaning | Awarded #1 Window Cleaners | Streak Free Guarantee

Page Load Speed

3.4 sec in total

First Response

31 ms

Resources Loaded

1.8 sec

Page Rendered

1.5 sec

windowcleaning.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Window Cleaning content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about windowcleaning.com

Servicing over 900 locations across the USA and Canada. Meticulous window cleaning. Fully Insured. $1000 Streak Free Guarantee. Instant free quotes.

Visit windowcleaning.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Windowcleaning.com page load time and found that the first response time was 31 ms and then it took 3.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

windowcleaning.com performance score

61

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.7 s

61/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.9 s

80/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.5 s

72/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value930 ms

30/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.112

86/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.7 s

56/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

windowcleaning.com

31 ms

www.windowcleaning.com

293 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

10 ms

www.windowcleaning.com

156 ms

theme-min.css

18 ms

Our browser made a total of 62 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 58% of them (36 requests) were addressed to the original Windowcleaning.com, 8% (5 requests) were made to Wc-live.s3.amazonaws.com and 6% (4 requests) were made to Platform.twitter.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (570 ms) relates to the external source Wc-live.s3.amazonaws.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 790.7 kB (39%)

Content Size

2.0 MB

After Optimization

1.2 MB

In fact, the total size of Windowcleaning.com main page is 2.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 53.1 kB

  • Original 66.9 kB
  • After minification 59.6 kB
  • After compression 13.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 7.3 kB, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 53.1 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-10%

Potential reduce by 115.4 kB

  • Original 1.2 MB
  • After minification 1.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Window Cleaning images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 202.0 kB

  • Original 272.8 kB
  • After minification 234.7 kB
  • After compression 70.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 202.0 kB or 74% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 420.1 kB

  • Original 485.5 kB
  • After minification 398.1 kB
  • After compression 65.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Windowcleaning.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 420.1 kB or 87% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 26 (43%)

Requests Now

60

After Optimization

34

The browser has sent 60 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Window Cleaning. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

windowcleaning.com accessibility score

92

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

windowcleaning.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

windowcleaning.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Windowcleaning.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Windowcleaning.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Window Cleaning. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: