Report Summary

  • 78

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    85% of other websites

  • 100

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 97% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 99

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    93% of websites

womenetics.com

Womenetics – Womenetics provides high caliber content

Page Load Speed

2 sec in total

First Response

61 ms

Resources Loaded

1.5 sec

Page Rendered

409 ms

womenetics.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Womenetics content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about womenetics.com

Womenetics provides high caliber content

Visit womenetics.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Womenetics.com page load time and found that the first response time was 61 ms and then it took 1.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

womenetics.com performance score

78

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.6 s

32/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.6 s

61/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.3 s

57/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value40 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.8 s

90/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

womenetics.com

61 ms

www.womenetics.com

224 ms

www.womenetics.com

141 ms

default.css

55 ms

module.css

48 ms

Our browser made a total of 72 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 89% of them (64 requests) were addressed to the original Womenetics.com, 3% (2 requests) were made to Ssl.google-analytics.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Platform.twitter.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (550 ms) belongs to the original domain Womenetics.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.6 MB (38%)

Content Size

4.2 MB

After Optimization

2.6 MB

In fact, the total size of Womenetics.com main page is 4.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 70.7 kB

  • Original 93.4 kB
  • After minification 84.0 kB
  • After compression 22.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 70.7 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-9%

Potential reduce by 228.2 kB

  • Original 2.5 MB
  • After minification 2.3 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Womenetics images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 997.4 kB

  • Original 1.3 MB
  • After minification 920.8 kB
  • After compression 263.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 997.4 kB or 79% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 304.1 kB

  • Original 346.0 kB
  • After minification 254.7 kB
  • After compression 41.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Womenetics.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 304.1 kB or 88% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 35 (51%)

Requests Now

68

After Optimization

33

The browser has sent 68 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Womenetics. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

womenetics.com accessibility score

100

Accessibility Issues

Best Practices

womenetics.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

womenetics.com SEO score

99

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    ID

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Womenetics.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Womenetics.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Womenetics. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: