Tools & Wizards About Us
wordfeeder.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 90

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    91% of other websites

  • 89

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 72% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 67

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    25% of websites

wordfeeder.com

Best Quality PLR Articles and Membership | Wordfeeder

Page Load Speed

591 ms in total

First Response

92 ms

Resources Loaded

315 ms

Page Rendered

184 ms

wordfeeder.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Wordfeeder content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about wordfeeder.com

Visit wordfeeder.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Wordfeeder.com page load time and found that the first response time was 92 ms and then it took 499 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only 5% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

wordfeeder.com performance score

90

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.3 s

98/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.2 s

95/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.0 s

99/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value190 ms

91/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.152

75/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.6 s

81/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

wordfeeder.com

92 ms

www.wordfeeder.com

130 ms

wordfeederlogo2.gif

46 ms

dina2014.JPG

95 ms

Our browser made a total of 4 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Wordfeeder.com and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (130 ms) belongs to the original domain Wordfeeder.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 11.8 kB (12%)

Content Size

99.7 kB

After Optimization

87.9 kB

  • HTML
  • Images

In fact, the total size of Wordfeeder.com main page is 99.7 kB. This result falls within a vast category (top 1 000 000) of heavyweight, probably not optimized, and thus slow loading web pages. Only 5% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 84.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-64%

Potential reduce by 9.5 kB

  • Original 14.9 kB
  • After minification 14.0 kB
  • After compression 5.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 9.5 kB or 64% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 2.2 kB

  • Original 84.8 kB
  • After minification 82.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Wordfeeder images are well optimized though.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

2

After Optimization

2

  • Images

The browser has sent 2 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Wordfeeder. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

wordfeeder.com

wordfeeder.com

92 ms

www.wordfeeder.com

www.wordfeeder.com

130 ms

wordfeederlogo2.gif

wordfeederlogo2.gif

46 ms

dina2014.JPG

dina2014.JPG

95 ms

Accessibility Review

wordfeeder.com accessibility score

89

Accessibility Issues

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

wordfeeder.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

wordfeeder.com SEO score

67

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Wordfeeder.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Wordfeeder.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

wordfeeder.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Wordfeeder. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: